Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

RE: Placement and Scale Features Problems

RE: Placement and Scale Features Problems

2007-08-31 by Stephen Billard

It is definately a feature request. Scale to Fit was conceived of as
printing the image in as large a size as would fit on the page.  Centering
insured that this would be the case. This certainly could change. However,
I'd like a little debate on the forum about the request to see what others
think.
 
For those of you on the QTR list: What behavior would you like to see? Be
specific like Jeff was.
 
- Stephen
stephen.sbillard.org <http://www.sbillard.org/> 
 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Jeff.Randall@... [mailto:Jeff.Randall@...] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:07 PM
To: stephen@...
Subject: Placement and Scale Features Problems


Hi Stephen:
 
QTRgui 2.5.1.9
 
I don't know if this falls into a Feature request or bug report or both.
 
The Placement and Scale features are not working as I expect (want?).
 
1) Under Tools|Options Auto Orient and Drag and Drop Auto Print are NOT
checked.
2) I set my Orientation. Placement|Centered and Scale|To Fit are not
checked.
3) I drag an image to the open QTRgui window or File|Select Image.
4) The upper top left of the image (relative to the QTRgui thumbnail) is as
shown in the Placement|Top - Left text boxes. [As expected]
5) I can increase or decrease the scale and the image grows or shrinks with
the top left of the image remaining stationary. [As expected].
6) If I check Scale|To Fit, the Placement|Centered box becomes also checked
and the image is scaled up or down properly BUT centered on the short side.
[Unexpected].
7) I can uncheck Placement|Centered and reset the top left image corner to
my liking, BUT these are to my mind wasted steps. 
 
a) I'd like the Placement|Centered and Scale|To Fit functions to be
independent. This is most critical if the Drag and Drop Auto Print and the
Monitored Folders features are checked.  
 
b) I'd also like to be able to set a single fixed top left of each image AND
have QTRgui scale to fit *each* different size image in the que to the
remaining image area whether portrait or landscape orientation is manually
or automatically selected or if am manually drag or use select individual
images OR using Drag and Drop Auto Print or Monitored Folders is used. 
 
c) I'd like to check both Placement|Centered and Scale|To Fit functions and
have QTRgui scale and center each different size image in the que.  
 
c) A lock feature that would lock the Scale % and/or the top left corner
coords to a fixed value for all images in the que (as is done now by
default) would complete the flexible suite of features.
 
Am I missing something -- am I nuts?
 

jr




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Placement and Scale Features Problems

2007-09-27 by sssubito

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Billard" <stephen@...> 
wrote:
>
> It is definately a feature request. Scale to Fit was conceived of as
> printing the image in as large a size as would fit on the page.  
Centering
> insured that this would be the case. This certainly could change. 
However,
> I'd like a little debate on the forum about the request to see what 
others
> think.
>  
> For those of you on the QTR list: What behavior would you like to 
see? Be
> specific like Jeff was.
>  
> - Stephen
> stephen.sbillard.org <http://www.sbillard.org/> 
>  

No replies, strange. Here's my opinion:

I'd prefer to have the options "centered" and "scale to fit" act 
indipendently. Whatever I want, I could switch on and have it working 
as expected. Like Jeff, I had situations where I had to turn of 
centering after switching on "scale to fit". Only a little 
annoyance...


///Horst

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Placement and Scale Features Problems

2007-09-27 by Alan Ansell

> For those of you on the QTR list: What behavior would you like
to
see? Be
> specific like Jeff was.
>
> - Stephen
> stephen.sbillard.org <[1]http://www.sbillard.org/>

Did I miss this earlier post? Apologies for not replying sooner.
For my money, one really nice feature I'd like to see added to
QTR is when using the calibration switch, which forces QTR to
print an ink limit page (titled Ink Pattern Page) that we are
given a further option to select which of the several supplied
TIFFs we would like to use.

I notice that there are several in the folder, and one of the
things I first found most confusing about QTR was  when trying to
create curves for a five or six channel printer, when the printed
page was always eight channels. So rather than have to work out
which were being used, and for what, I'd like to be able to
choose the ink seperation output that matched my specific printer
(in my case a 1289/1290 using just six channels).

References

1. http://www.sbillard.org/
-- 
  Alan Ansell
  aansell@...



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Placement and Scale Features Problems

2007-09-27 by Stephen Billard

You don't need an option, just select the TIFF before you print like you
would with a regular picture. 


- Stephen
stephen.sbillard.org
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Alan Ansell
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:59 AM
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Placement and Scale Features Problems

> For those of you on the QTR list: What behavior would you like
to
see? Be
> specific like Jeff was.
>
> - Stephen
> stephen.sbillard.org <[1]http://www.sbillard.org/>

Did I miss this earlier post? Apologies for not replying sooner.
For my money, one really nice feature I'd like to see added to QTR is when
using the calibration switch, which forces QTR to print an ink limit page
(titled Ink Pattern Page) that we are given a further option to select which
of the several supplied TIFFs we would like to use.

I notice that there are several in the folder, and one of the things I first
found most confusing about QTR was  when trying to create curves for a five
or six channel printer, when the printed page was always eight channels. So
rather than have to work out which were being used, and for what, I'd like
to be able to choose the ink seperation output that matched my specific
printer (in my case a 1289/1290 using just six channels).

References

1. http://www.sbillard.org/
--
  Alan Ansell
  aansell@...



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.