QTR-Piezo experimenting on 1280 - what blending does
2005-07-24 by odesmais
I have now started experimenting QTR today. I have totally turn down the option of editing/tweaking piezo profiles : smoothness can simply not be achieved (at least I could not). All characterization part is fine but... as long as only 4 inks are declared and 2 unused in a single curve. For memo, with a 1280 inks are : KCMY_LC_LM and LC is the same as M and LM the same as Y dilution. If I make a curve with the 6 heads firing some bandings appear (I suspect that the crossover is somehow messy a bit there... and I have precisely 2 bands). Now, if 2 curves are created (just one uses MY and the other LC and LM), then both stepwedges are amazingly fine, smooth and very linear. Slightly different in L* but to me this is normal : what I'm looking for is the highest smoothness possible and different heads though using the same ink can fire differently. So in view of using the 6 heads (say for the sake of not ending with bad clogging or searching additional smoothness, testing dithering, or simply not to leave 2 bottles of ink unused and only deplete the others), I blended the 2 curves precisely at 50 and was expecting an output either close to the 2 single ones or an "averaging" of the 2. I ended up very a far from a linear output: up to 3 L out of the theoretical linear curve vs 0,5 L for single curves in the worst measurement. I am very puzzled and I can't understand how this can be ? I'm fine going forward with QTR and keep on experimenting (I'll try the profiling-CMS features next), but I'd like to understand the blending process. Is the blending only meaning Can anyone help me understand? Olivier