Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?

Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?

2008-12-22 by rabanito

I have an Epson 2880. For starters I wanted to use QTR with Premium
Glossy Photo paper. Using the settings "optimized B&W Photo" from
Photoshop I get satisfactory results.
Following the user's guide I looked for curves for this paper but
found none. I tried then UCpk-raw-neut (both curves) and printed. The
result is not satisfactory so I thought I could try to create my own
curves...
Well I printed the InkSeparation.tif file, Ink Slider to the right(not
to the left) so as to get the value 100 and got a age with all 8 inks.
Now I'm stuck. I don't understand what I'm supposed to look for. "the
patch where it appears that all paper is covered with ink" Does this
mean the patches where one cannot distinguish the fine lines? Or where
one cannot distinguish a patch from the next? I'm using a loupe.
The problem is that it doesn't look like I understand what I am doing
at all. Some parts of the user's guide are elementary, others seem to
speak to persons with a previous knowledge (in printing techniques) I
don't possess :-(
Is there anything I can do/read?

Thank you for any help

Jorge

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?

2008-12-22 by Roy Harrington

The raw curves are unlinearized.   I don´t know what you mean as
not satisfactory.  Try the other pk ones.  If you really need to do your
own start with the existing ones.

Roy
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM, rabanito <rabsanito@...> wrote:
> I have an Epson 2880. For starters I wanted to use QTR with Premium
> Glossy Photo paper. Using the settings "optimized B&W Photo" from
> Photoshop I get satisfactory results.
> Following the user's guide I looked for curves for this paper but
> found none. I tried then UCpk-raw-neut (both curves) and printed. The
> result is not satisfactory so I thought I could try to create my own
> curves...
> Well I printed the InkSeparation.tif file, Ink Slider to the right(not
> to the left) so as to get the value 100 and got a age with all 8 inks.
> Now I'm stuck. I don't understand what I'm supposed to look for. "the
> patch where it appears that all paper is covered with ink" Does this
> mean the patches where one cannot distinguish the fine lines? Or where
> one cannot distinguish a patch from the next? I'm using a loupe.
> The problem is that it doesn't look like I understand what I am doing
> at all. Some parts of the user's guide are elementary, others seem to
> speak to persons with a previous knowledge (in printing techniques) I
> don't possess :-(
> Is there anything I can do/read?
>
> Thank you for any help
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?

2008-12-22 by jorge caruso

Thanks Roy. 
About what I mean with  "not satisfactory": my test prints with the raw curves produced grays where I expected blacks. But I'll try the other curves.
The problem I addressed is my not understanding the process as described in the user's guide.  Perhaps it's above me :-(  Or I am just unprepared.
Just as an example:
In the old (wet) days I used to calibrate a batch of film and match it to a batch of paper I liked to use. I also practiced "visualization", trying to match my perception of a scene to values of an abbreviated gray scale  I'd stored in my mind (no, not 10 Zones, just some :-) . The results were not exact, to be sincere, but I had the feeling that I understood what I was doing - what happened and why - in every step. I understood what happened if I changed anything. I could "fine tune" the process if I wished.and  also roughly predict the results. 

Now digital: My intention with QTR is to arrive to some kind of B&W softproofing. To be able to predict what will be printed related to what I see in my monitor. Eventually changing this or that parameter.

Thanks for your patience :)

Jorge





________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 9:01:01 PM
Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?


The raw curves are unlinearized.   I don´t know what you mean as
not satisfactory.  Try the other pk ones.  If you really need to do your
own start with the existing ones.

Roy


>
>
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
    


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?

2008-12-23 by Roy Harrington

I suspect that its something other than the curves.  What are you using
to print -- ie. PC/Mac, Photoshop?  OPtions selected?

Roy
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 12/22/08, jorge caruso <rabsanito@...> wrote:
> Thanks Roy.
> About what I mean with  "not satisfactory": my test prints with the raw curves produced grays where I expected blacks. But I'll try the other curves.
> The problem I addressed is my not understanding the process as described in the user's guide.  Perhaps it's above me :-(  Or I am just unprepared.
> Just as an example:
> In the old (wet) days I used to calibrate a batch of film and match it to a batch of paper I liked to use. I also practiced "visualization", trying to match my perception of a scene to values of an abbreviated gray scale  I'd stored in my mind (no, not 10 Zones, just some :-) . The results were not exact, to be sincere, but I had the feeling that I understood what I was doing - what happened and why - in every step. I understood what happened if I changed anything. I could "fine tune" the process if I wished.and  also roughly predict the results.
>
> Now digital: My intention with QTR is to arrive to some kind of B&W softproofing. To be able to predict what will be printed related to what I see in my monitor. Eventually changing this or that parameter.
>
> Thanks for your patience :)
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Roy Harrington <roy@...>
> To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 9:01:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?
>
>
> The raw curves are unlinearized.   I don´t know what you mean as
> not satisfactory.  Try the other pk ones.  If you really need to do your
> own start with the existing ones.
>
> Roy
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?

2008-12-24 by jorge caruso

I'm printing from QTR Gui, I understand that with  PC it is not possible to print from Photoshop. 


This time I tried the curves for Velvet Fine Art with Premium Semigloss, Resolution 1440 super (w the Epson 2880) Speed unidirectional Printing Model Quad R2880. (what is a "printig model"? :-) There are no curves for the papers I'm using for practice (Premium Semigloss and Premium Glossy) so I am not sure I'm doing the "best" thing.

Now the prints were way better and I assume I made some crass mistake before that I could not repeat this time.

I experimented with curve blending and changing gamma and ink limit and  I think I begin to grasp the idea.
All I am doing is trial and error now. Is there a more systematic approach?

Thanks and Happy Holidays

Jorge









________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Roy Harrington <roy@...>
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 9:25:45 AM
Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?


I suspect that its something other than the curves.  What are you using
to print -- ie. PC/Mac, Photoshop?  OPtions selected?

Roy

On 12/22/08, jorge caruso <rabsanito@yahoo. com> wrote:
> Thanks Roy.
> About what I mean with  "not satisfactory" : my test prints with the raw curves produced grays where I expected blacks. But I'll try the other curves.
> The problem I addressed is my not understanding the process as described in the user's guide.  Perhaps it's above me :-(  Or I am just unprepared.
> Just as an example:
> In the old (wet) days I used to calibrate a batch of film and match it to a batch of paper I liked to use. I also practiced "visualization" , trying to match my perception of a scene to values of an abbreviated gray scale  I'd stored in my mind (no, not 10 Zones, just some :-) . The results were not exact, to be sincere, but I had the feeling that I understood what I was doing - what happened and why - in every step. I understood what happened if I changed anything. I could "fine tune" the process if I wished.and  also roughly predict the results.
>
> Now digital: My intention with QTR is to arrive to some kind of B&W softproofing. To be able to predict what will be printed related to what I see in my monitor. Eventually changing this or that parameter.
>
> Thanks for your patience :)
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Roy Harrington <roy@harrington. com>
> To: QuadtoneRIP@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 9:01:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Previous knowledge. Where can I find what I need?
>
>
> The raw curves are unlinearized.   I don´t know what you mean as
> not satisfactory.  Try the other pk ones.  If you really need to do your
> own start with the existing ones.
>
> Roy
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
    


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.