SynthModules

Brice,

Please forget messing with code and finish building and shipping the
modules. The code, right now, means nothing to most of us.

Thank you.

ac

On 01/03/06, synthmodules <synthmodules@synthmodules.com> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I believe this is unnecessary.  I have already re-opened the "Files"
> section of this group to members so everyone can upload/download code
> again.  The files there are in their original form without change.
> They are as the authors uploaded them.  I have also noted that *all*
> PSIM-1 programs are PUBLIC DOMAIN... so I believe this addresses all
> the issues you stated.
>
> I'm working on cleaning up the code to make sure all the programs are
> consistant with the header including the PUBLIC DOMAIN statement.  I
> am looking for input from the community on the wording of the header
> as I stated in my previous message.
>
> I hope this clears up issues regarding availability of code.  At one
> point I was working on a better way to share the code, but this site
> is the easiest for everyone to use.
>
> Take care,
>
> Brice
> http://www.SynthModules.com
>
> --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "rdrake" <rdrake@...> wrote:
> >
> > Brice,
> >
> > I am in the process of setting up a site where users of your product
> can discuss and share code.  To avoid some of the current issues
> regarding ownership and licensing, I propose that the actual authors
> of the individual programs post their own code, and will leave it to
> their discretion what licensing restrictions (if any) they wish to
> include.
> >
> > This site is not intended to compete with the resources you have set
> up, nor is an attack on you personally.  I'm trying to constructivly
> address a couple of the issues (code ownership, availability &
> licensing) we've been discussing.  Perhaps by alleviating the burden
> of "managing" PSIM programming code, you'll have more time to devote
> to fulfilling your hardware committments.  I hope that you'll choose
> to contribute your own PSIM code to the site when you have time
> (licensed as you see fit), but obviously that will be your choice.
> >
> > If you have any concerns regarding this project (potential
> infringement, etc.), please let me know in the next couple of days so
> that I can address them.  Best of luck with all.
> >
> > regards
> > Bob Drake
> > rdrake@...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Message: 19
> > >   Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:09:07 -0000
> > >   From: "synthmodules"
> > ><synthmodules@...>
> > >Subject: SynthModules PSIM-1 Programs - PUBLIC
> > >DOMAIN
> > >
> > >Gary makes a good point.  My intentions were good
> > >and I was trying to
> > >make it in the best interest of the community
> > >(although it seems that
> > >was misunderstood).  Anyway, I am in the process of
> > >changing the
> > >headers on all the code to reflect ALL PSIM-1 code
> > >is PUBLIC DOMAIN.
> > >
> > >Please note, the code many of you were seeing that
> > >was still on the
> > >Web site (although the link didn't work on purpose,
> > >some managed to
> > >find old code sitting around from last year with a
> > >very early form of
> > >the GPL header inserted as a test) is NOT the code
> > >that was supposed
> > >to be seen or used.  It has been removed so there
> > >will be no further
> > >confusion until I can get all the programs fixed
> > >with the PUBLIC
> > >DOMAIN header.  Also, my wording in the header may
> > >have been
> > >confusing.  I was in no way trying to imply the
> > >CODE was my
> > >intellectual property.  I did design the PSIM-1
> > >(and yes, as you all
> > >know Grant did help some, but he did not design
> > >it).  I think I still
> > >deserve credit for the idea and design and would
> > >like something in the
> > >header that states it.  Is that so wrong?  If not,
> > >any suggestions as
> > >to the wording so no one gets upset?
> > >
> > >- Brice
> > >http://www.SynthModules.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to check out the primary Web site at:
> http://www.SynthModules.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>