SynthModules

That's why I put it back up the way it was.  However, there are times
though during the day here at work when I can tweak the code.  That's
what I was talking about.  

- Brice


--- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, ac <analoghell@...> wrote:
>
> Brice,
> 
> Please forget messing with code and finish building and shipping the
> modules. The code, right now, means nothing to most of us.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> ac
> 
> On 01/03/06, synthmodules <synthmodules@...> wrote:
> > Bob,
> >
> > I believe this is unnecessary.  I have already re-opened the "Files"
> > section of this group to members so everyone can upload/download code
> > again.  The files there are in their original form without change.
> > They are as the authors uploaded them.  I have also noted that *all*
> > PSIM-1 programs are PUBLIC DOMAIN... so I believe this addresses all
> > the issues you stated.
> >
> > I'm working on cleaning up the code to make sure all the programs are
> > consistant with the header including the PUBLIC DOMAIN statement.  I
> > am looking for input from the community on the wording of the header
> > as I stated in my previous message.
> >
> > I hope this clears up issues regarding availability of code.  At one
> > point I was working on a better way to share the code, but this site
> > is the easiest for everyone to use.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Brice
> > http://www.SynthModules.com
> >
> > --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "rdrake" <rdrake@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Brice,
> > >
> > > I am in the process of setting up a site where users of your product
> > can discuss and share code.  To avoid some of the current issues
> > regarding ownership and licensing, I propose that the actual authors
> > of the individual programs post their own code, and will leave it to
> > their discretion what licensing restrictions (if any) they wish to
> > include.
> > >
> > > This site is not intended to compete with the resources you have set
> > up, nor is an attack on you personally.  I'm trying to constructivly
> > address a couple of the issues (code ownership, availability &
> > licensing) we've been discussing.  Perhaps by alleviating the burden
> > of "managing" PSIM programming code, you'll have more time to devote
> > to fulfilling your hardware committments.  I hope that you'll choose
> > to contribute your own PSIM code to the site when you have time
> > (licensed as you see fit), but obviously that will be your choice.
> > >
> > > If you have any concerns regarding this project (potential
> > infringement, etc.), please let me know in the next couple of days so
> > that I can address them.  Best of luck with all.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Bob Drake
> > > rdrake@
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Message: 19
> > > >   Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:09:07 -0000
> > > >   From: "synthmodules"
> > > ><synthmodules@>
> > > >Subject: SynthModules PSIM-1 Programs - PUBLIC
> > > >DOMAIN
> > > >
> > > >Gary makes a good point.  My intentions were good
> > > >and I was trying to
> > > >make it in the best interest of the community
> > > >(although it seems that
> > > >was misunderstood).  Anyway, I am in the process of
> > > >changing the
> > > >headers on all the code to reflect ALL PSIM-1 code
> > > >is PUBLIC DOMAIN.
> > > >
> > > >Please note, the code many of you were seeing that
> > > >was still on the
> > > >Web site (although the link didn't work on purpose,
> > > >some managed to
> > > >find old code sitting around from last year with a
> > > >very early form of
> > > >the GPL header inserted as a test) is NOT the code
> > > >that was supposed
> > > >to be seen or used.  It has been removed so there
> > > >will be no further
> > > >confusion until I can get all the programs fixed
> > > >with the PUBLIC
> > > >DOMAIN header.  Also, my wording in the header may
> > > >have been
> > > >confusing.  I was in no way trying to imply the
> > > >CODE was my
> > > >intellectual property.  I did design the PSIM-1
> > > >(and yes, as you all
> > > >know Grant did help some, but he did not design
> > > >it).  I think I still
> > > >deserve credit for the idea and design and would
> > > >like something in the
> > > >header that states it.  Is that so wrong?  If not,
> > > >any suggestions as
> > > >to the wording so no one gets upset?
> > > >
> > > >- Brice
> > > >http://www.SynthModules.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Be sure to check out the primary Web site at:
> > http://www.SynthModules.com
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>