> From: "Colin f" <colin@colinfraser.com> > Reply-To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:51:14 +0100 > To: <analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] pattern length > >> It seems like on the P3, if wanted to send out 4 different >> controllers to >> one MIDI channel on a synth, and I wanted each of these rows to be a >> different length and/or time division, I'd have to set up 4 >> (or 5, if I >> wanted them to all be different from the basic pattern length and time >> division) tracks to do this. The Polymorph is limited to 3 rows of >> controllers per track, but I can set each to a different time >> division and >> length. >> >> Is this correct? > > That's correct. I think someone (probably Paul N) mentioned the separate > lengths for controllers on Polymorph patterns as a desirable feature > many moons ago, but decided using a couple of extra tracks was a > reasonable work-around. > It's something I could implement, but it would need extra storage to > hold the last steps for the auxes, which could mean fewer patterns. > I get the feeling it would probably go unused by most people, and would > no doubt deeply confuse some... > Another feature for P4 ;-) > > Cheers, > Colin f Understood. It's challenging, but also great fun to learn both the Polymorph and P3 simultaneously. The polymorph is really a great little synth (in my opinion), greatly because of its sequencer. It doesn't do nearly as much as the P3, but it really does some of the RIGHT things, and it is easy to use. I will probably use it as a self-contained synth, and not use its sequencer to control other synths, unless, of course, I get sick of its sound. Right now, I rather like it. Personally, I would go for this added capability in the P3 even if it meant fewer patterns (of course, how many fewer would be the crucial issue). If you wanted to set up 4 different time divisions or line lengths for one sound on the synth, it would take up half of your available tracks on the P3, whereas it can be done on one track of the Polymorph. But, I personally really like this feature, and others may not want to sacrifice for it. But as far as getting confused? nah....it would be far less confusing than remembering the proper key strokes in playlist edit mode, which is driving me crazy right now. I just can't seem to remember them correctly...
Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] pattern length
2004-06-27 by Gene Schwartz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.