Analogue-sequencer

> So I understand you get 4 CC's per track...does this mean if I want
> to have control a large 
> number of parameters on just one synth...I could send all 8 sequencer
> tracks to the same 
> synth..therefore controlling 32 MIDI cc's? 

You could, though if you send 32 CC messages on the same step you might
discover what MIDI latency is...
Another alternative is to use a pair of auxes on a single track - set aux A
to the event 'aux B = cc #n', and you can use the value of aux A to choose
the controller number for aux B. Then set the values on aux B as normal.
This lets you send any controller number in a single pattern, with the
obvious limit of only sending one or two controllers per step (using A and B
paired, plus C and D paired).
If you want some fun, you could use aux A to randomize the value of aux C,
and aux B to randomize the value of aux D.
The assign aux C to 'aux D = cc #n', and you will get random controller
numbers sending random values, within a range of your choice.
 
> I have two playlists...both have the same CC assignments...

CC assignments are in patterns - I'm guessing you mean patterns when you say
playlists ?

> Is it
> possible to edit one playlist 
> without affecting the other *if you are cycling through them
> simulataneously* (For 
> example: earlier I was cycling through two playlists...went to edit
> mode on 1 and was 
> sculpting the Filter Cutoff...it seemed to affect the filter cutoff
> info for the other playlist as 
> well...of course the sounds were pretty wild and it might have just
> been my mind playing 
> tricks on me)..

Hmm.
It could be you have the same pattern in two different playlists - I'm not
entirely clear what you're doing so I can't say if its all in your mind, or
your P3's.

Best regards,
Colin Fraser
Sequentix Music Systems Ltd
http://www.sequentix.com