> Just to confirm something else I was testing - when a step is active > and playing, the data (and knobs) associated with that step is not > being continually scanned and refreshed, right? The knobs are continually scanned, but changing the note doesn't cause it to be played until next time round. That would be a real pain for live use, so I went for visual confirmation instead. Plus you can use FTS and not worry about bum notes. Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Cascading Auxes (followup)
2005-09-29 by Colin f