> Can you mount a power supply inside the rack mount case. In the Kit > pictures, it looks like there might be room. Has anyone done > this (USA 120v > supply). I think there should be plenty room. The reason I use a wall wart supply is because it means exemption from a number of regulatory tests and certification requirements that mains powered equipment needs. Plus it's a little cheaper. > Colin stated in an early post to analog-sequencer that he was > not going to > support others writing code for the P3 (or in effect that). > Any chance you > might change your mind Colin? P3 will remain closed source for a number of reasons. First is that I'm trying to make a living from it, and though I like to believe most people honour 'not for commercial use' clauses, I know very well that a small minority don't give a toss, and would happily run off kits or complete units for sale without contributing anything to the development cost. Second is that although many of the ideas in P3 have come from other users, they all get filtered through me in a way that I hope maintains a degree of consistency. Open source projects have a tendency to branch off in a thousand different directions, and P3 is aimed more at people who want to make music than people who want to futz around with software. Another reason is that there are 14,000 lines of C in the P3 source, and it's undergone a lot of optimisation over time to reduce the size and fit more in. A lot of this makes it very difficult to follow unless you already know what the code is doing. > The data input and MIDI control of the P3 are VERY > impressive. The only > major feature of the Schrittmacher, that makes it worth > looking at, is the > different row lengths for note and velocity data. Those are interesting features, but I'm not sure how many P3 people actually miss the ability to do that simply. Beyond a certain level of complexity, tricks like that all tend to start just sounding random, and you can do that easily enough. I could have put in a different pattern length for each row, but decided that would probably just complicate things more than necessary for the majority of people who don't use such features. If I come to do a sequencer in the Schrittmacher price range, you can be sure it will do a lot more than that ;-) Best regards, Colin Fraser Sequentix Music Systems Ltd http://www.sequentix.com
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Looking at P3 (questions)
2006-01-27 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.