Analogue-sequencer

--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Chang" <gchang@...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> Maybe someone has suggested this already I might have missed it.  (I
> am just offering my opinion).
> 
> In a perfect world, when jumping to another pattern where the knobs
> are in really different positions that the previous pattern, I would
> prefer that turning the knob would become active when it crosses the
> stored pattern's value, thus removing the inadvertant jump due to
> the circumstances.... (A sort of manual nulling of the pot).
> 
> I prefer this to "relative" motion incrementing, which doesn't quite
> work without endless rotary encoders, or the existing "that's the
> way it is" jump simply due to the initial position of the pots....
> 
> Gary
>

Or do like the Waldorf Wave does and offer the user a choice of modes 
(relative, pass-thru, or jump).  Depending on the code space 
requirements, you can have a user-config option for knob edit mode 
and let the user select what works best for them.