>>Are you the Duncan who posts on the Genoqs site? If so, did you ever get your Zeit? I'd be curious as to your experiences with that.<< paul- he said the "z" word! yes, I (rude word) am. no, the (rude word) zeit hasn't (rude word) shown up yet. it's well over a (rude word) year since I paid for it, taking over mr nagle's place in a suuposedly very short queue of (rude word) "beta testers". well, I mean no offence to any of the h/w sequencer fans who've managed to (rude word) jump ahead of me & already have their (rude word) machines, while I'm still (rude word) waiting, but the very reason paul suggested me as his replacement was that I am.... no, I can't finish that sentence without sounding like a bitter twisted w*nker. you will have got the general idea by now. but I will add this: between seeing the octopus for the first time (on the fab musicthing blogsite) & unwrapping the bugger at my desk at work was about a month. maybe less- I'd have to check. & I know that in terms of hardware resources, gabriel is no better off than david. anyway. it's partly because of the depth of the p3 that I decided to go for the zeit. the p3 is too complex a beast for (ahem) everyone in my band to operate comfortably. the zeit looked like it would be a bit more user-friendly, as more of the functionality we would typically have needed is exposed through the larger UI. but now, music-lovers, we are working on an album with hardly any sequencer on it at all.... it's all drums, bass & guitar. there is a section with the p3 on it, but we're having arguements about whether it gets to stay on. ho, as they say, ho ho. duncan.
Message
Re: Paul's Octopus review in SOS
2007-02-27 by ferrograph632
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.