i use transpose defeat alot. i'll write a melody on one track and then transpose defeat it, and then use an external keyboard to transpose a bassline or whatever else i have running on the other tracks.
josh <notjoshua@gmail.com> wrote: Now I understand.
...never really use Xpose defeat either! ;-)
do many of yous out there?
On 10/12/07, Colin Fraser <colin@sequentix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > i kind of like how it is now too.
> > good slidins!
>
> I like how it is now too - I'm talking about adding the ability to extend
> a
> note, in addition to tie.
> Tie means that the same note is held, or different notes are overlapped.
> Extend would mean that the first note would be held over multiple steps,
> even though the note values for subsequent steps may be different.
> The advantage of extending a note would be that if you turned off the
> extend
> on following steps, the original note values are still there.
> It may be that this is a more sensible use of the 'X' row than the current
> 'transpose defeat' thing.
>
> Best regards,
> Colin Fraser
> Sequentix Music Systems Ltd
> http://www.sequentix.com
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake.
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [analogue-sequencer] individual step note lengths?
2007-10-14 by Zahir Manek
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.