Analogue-sequencer

But if the P3's OS was written to be able to transpose all 8 Tracks
seperately, instead of the global transpose... would you need it?

Dave

On Sun, October 14, 2007 5:32 am, Zahir Manek wrote:
> i use transpose defeat alot. i'll write a melody on one track and then
> transpose defeat it, and then use an external keyboard to transpose a
> bassline or whatever else i have running on the other tracks.
>
> josh <notjoshua@gmail.com> wrote:          Now I understand.
>
> ...never really use Xpose defeat either! ;-)
>
>
> do many of yous out there?
>
> On 10/12/07, Colin Fraser <colin@sequentix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> i kind of like how it is now too. good slidins!
>>
>> I like how it is now too - I'm talking about adding the ability to
>> extend a note, in addition to tie. Tie means that the same note is held,
>> or different notes are overlapped. Extend would mean that the first note
>> would be held over multiple steps, even though the note values for
>> subsequent steps may be different. The advantage of extending a note
>> would be that if you turned off the extend on following steps, the
>> original note values are still there. It may be that this is a more
>> sensible use of the 'X' row than the current 'transpose defeat' thing.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Colin Fraser
>> Sequentix Music Systems Ltd
>> http://www.sequentix.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Building a website is a piece of cake.
> Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>