> In the P3 RemCon pdf cc #18 is listed as 'multi-function > track select', in an attempt to find out what exactly this cc > does (haven't found an answer btw) Multi-function select steps the specified track through a number of modes - mute/umute/record. It's designed to work with a foot controller that only has 8 assignable switches - each switch can be assigned to step one track through the different modes. > I searched the groups > archive, and came across a number of posts about more > remote-control options you were looking to add and a few > alterations/improvements you'd like to make to pattern edit > mode; here's one: > http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/analogue-sequencer/message/5435 > and here's another: > http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/analogue-sequencer/message/5738 > > As it's been over half a year since the latest beta (v28) has > been released, and none of the stuff you mention in those > posts has been implemented yet I was wondering what the > current status of the beta v4 os was, and if a newer version > is to be expected. I still intend to finish off a few things, I just haven't had time to work on it for several months. Various other projects (electronic and otherwise) will be finished soon, so I will try to get a 'release' version of v4 out there, so I can leave it at that and dedicate coding effort to cirklon. On the off-chance that more than one P3 owner has a Yamaha GX-1, this might be of interest... http://www.sequentix.com/gx1 > There's two things i'd personally really like to see: > * remote control of the knobs in play mode > * a method (key-combo?) to have pattern edit mode's sculpt & > randomize functions affect only the current bar in a pattern. They both sound pretty simple to achieve... > Lastly i'd just like to say that I was perfectly happy using > OSv3 before I had the memX expansion, but since i've made the > switch to v4 I have to say it's a lot more intuitive to work > with, and I now understand why you chose to go the v4 road.. :) Having used v4 for so long myself, I find v3 almost impossible to use - I just can't remember how it all hangs together. There are some things in v4 I wish I had done differently though, and of course, these will appear in cirklon. Cheers, Colin
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] OSv4 developments?
2009-04-11 by Colin f
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.