Yahoo Groups archive

Analogue-sequencer

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC

Thread

auxD sending program changes?

auxD sending program changes?

2004-11-29 by roelp23

Hi,
While I was playing with the marvelous aux events,I noticed some 
weird stuff. I use track 1&2 for controlling the bassdrum of my jomox 
X base, aux A for event: rept note by length, AuxB for cc100 (tune of 
Xbase bass) AuxC for cc101 (pitch of xbasebass), AuxD for cc102 
(decay of xbasebass)For track 1 this works perfect, but when I do the 
same thing with track 2, it seems that AuxD isn't sending cc's 102, 
but program changes with value 1-127. I think that because Aux D 
doesn't have any effect on the decay of the bassdrum, but instead the 
jomox switches between it's internal patterns. The jomox has 64 
internal pattern's and the values of auxD 1-64 corresponds with those 
pattern's. 
A while ago I noticed that when I send program changenr. 1 on the 
same midichannel as the jomox the jomox internal pattern jumps to 
pattern 1. 
Does anyone know why my jomox reacts like that, and why there isn't 
any problem with track1? 
Cheers,
Roel

RE: [analogue-sequencer] auxD sending program changes?

2004-11-29 by Colin f

> While I was playing with the marvelous aux events,I noticed some 
> weird stuff.

That's the general idea ;-)

> I use track 1&2 for controlling the bassdrum of my jomox 
> X base, aux A for event: rept note by length, AuxB for cc100 (tune of 
> Xbase bass) AuxC for cc101 (pitch of xbasebass), AuxD for cc102 
> (decay of xbasebass)For track 1 this works perfect, but when I do the 
> same thing with track 2, it seems that AuxD isn't sending cc's 102, 
> but program changes with value 1-127. I think that because Aux D 
> doesn't have any effect on the decay of the bassdrum, but instead the 
> jomox switches between it's internal patterns. The jomox has 64 
> internal pattern's and the values of auxD 1-64 corresponds with those 
> pattern's. 
> A while ago I noticed that when I send program changenr. 1 on the 
> same midichannel as the jomox the jomox internal pattern jumps to 
> pattern 1. 
> Does anyone know why my jomox reacts like that, and why there isn't 
> any problem with track1? 

I'll check the behaviour here.
If I don't see the same thing, you could send me a sysex dump of the guilty
patterns to check.

Cheers,
Colin f

Re: auxD sending program changes?

2004-12-03 by colinfraser_com

Roel,

Sorry it's take me so long to check this out...
I've set up a pattern to do this on my P3 and can't see anything 
untoward.
Can you send me a sysex dump of the patterns, if you're still having 
this problem ?

Cheers,
Colin f


> > I use track 1&2 for controlling the bassdrum of my jomox 
> > X base, aux A for event: rept note by length, AuxB for cc100 
(tune of 
> > Xbase bass) AuxC for cc101 (pitch of xbasebass), AuxD for cc102 
> > (decay of xbasebass)For track 1 this works perfect, but when I 
do the 
> > same thing with track 2, it seems that AuxD isn't sending cc's 
102, 
> > but program changes with value 1-127. I think that because Aux D 
> > doesn't have any effect on the decay of the bassdrum, but 
instead the 
> > jomox switches between it's internal patterns. The jomox has 64 
> > internal pattern's and the values of auxD 1-64 corresponds with 
those 
> > pattern's. 
> > A while ago I noticed that when I send program changenr. 1 on 
the 
> > same midichannel as the jomox the jomox internal pattern jumps 
to 
> > pattern 1. 
> > Does anyone know why my jomox reacts like that, and why there 
isn't 
> > any problem with track1? 
> 
> I'll check the behaviour here.
> If I don't see the same thing, you could send me a sysex dump of 
the guilty
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> patterns to check.
> 
> Cheers,
> Colin f

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.