Analogue systems

I don't own a sequencer yet, but looking at the difference between the RS200
and the A155, I think one should also note that the A155 has two completely
independent gate outputs while the RS200 has only one (well 3 but they're
not fully independent).  Also the A154 expander has some interesting options
that the RS200 lacks-- the ability to do the steps in "pendulum" sequence,
and random, and something else I think.

Monroe

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:32 PM, stuadh <stuadh@hotmail.com> wrote:

>   Hi,
>
> there are three primary choices of true analogue sequencer in the
> Eurorack format, although several more possibilities (look here for a
> starter http://www.schneidersladen.de/english.html and look under step
> sequencers)
>
> I have the A-155, and although it is a useabe sequencer, I feel
> somewhat limited by only having 2 x 8 steps. My own opinion is that
> the RS200 is a better module, having for a start 3 x 8 steps although
> its overall functionality is very similar.
>
> The third option, although it is more expensive is the Analogue
> Solutions Oberkorn (http://www.analoguesolutions.com/ look under Oberkorn)
>
> The Oberkorn is 3 x 16 steps, giving three times the pattern
> capability of the A-155 with greater functionality, including my
> favourite, reset to step 16. This allows you to reset the sequence so
> that it starts at step 1, not step 2. Of course, with this, the price
> is starting to rise. If I had the money, I would commission a custom
> 8 x 16 step sequencer with a half dozen gate/trigger outs. Failing
> that, I'd probably buy three Oberkorns!
>
> In addition to a sequencer, you'll need a clock source (the Oberkorn
> has one built in) such as a midi-CV converter, clock or LFO source.
>
> A sequential Switch such as the A-151 or RS150 for chaining the
> different rows of steps together. I have altered my A151 to switch
> between 2, 3 or 4 rows.
>
> If you want to use your sequencer to generate musical sequences (i.e.
> control the pitch of your VCOs) you'll probably need at least one
> quantiser such as the RS260 or A156. I have the A156 which is
> perfectly serviceable.
>
> Other options include Midi sequencers such as the MAQ 16/3 from
> Doepfer, the Sequentix P3 (http://www.sequentix.com/) or the zeit rack
> (http://www.infectionmusic.com/sequencers/zeitrack.html).
>
> There is also the DIY option (I tried it but have been unsuccessful,
> so far. I need to do some more troubleshooting) such as the CGS 59
> Programmer (http://www.cgs.synth.net/) or the Milton
> (http://www.buzzclick-music.com/about_milton.html).
>
> There are also a number of "soft Sequencers such as the one in Reason,
> or Numerology. I tried the latter but I didn't really like it. When
> it comes down to it, I want to see lots of knobs and flashing LEDs.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Stuadh
>
>
> --- In analogue_systems@yahoogroups.com<analogue_systems%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "gepiengedi" <patilon@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hallo,
> >
> > still don´t know, for which of these two to decide.
> > can anybody tell something about advantages/disadvantages ?
> > for which one would you decide ?
> >
> > thanks & best regards
> > patilon
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]