I would be happy to help. Revise and edit my docs and provide some help for my programs. I looked at you accounts page. How are we going to pay for this? John, you should chip in to any thread and give your 2cents worth. This is the nature of these groups. I feel my enthusiasm has perhaps dominated here and this is not what I wanted and so I might hang back a bit. I am learning as much as any of you (particularly as Behringer is not very forthcoming) and I make some clanger of mistakes at times. For a start compare my notes to Mark's excellent implementation doc. Very different style, but with some information in common. Some will get more information from one style and others will prefer the other style. That's why we have so many books on the same subject. The other thing is that people are doing all sorts of things with these units. When questions come up I am amazed at what they are trying to do and I course I want to try to do it as well. A great resource of ideas. So I would encourage everyone to offer ideas and opinions. It's very friendly here and if anyone gave you a hard time I'm sure they would be treated accordingly. All the best Royce --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, john carroll <keiodi@...> wrote: > > I think that a wiki would be a great idea. of course a well organized wiki is important. I'm not sure that I would be doing much editing/administrating as I feel that many of the users here on this group are light years beyond me in bc knowledge.
Message
Re: BC2000 Wiki
2007-12-19 by rpcfender
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.