Yahoo Groups archive

Cgs synth

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Message

Re: Front Panels

2001-11-15 by J G Wong

I have been buying shaeffer panels and stooge panels and had some
fabricated elsewhere and it turns out that the shaeffer panels are a
pretty good deal esp at the current exchange rate.

g wong

Thom Somneevich wrote:
>
> Who are you going to use for the frontpanels? I like the idea of using
>
> Schaeffer because I know the software and don't have to worry about
> cutting
> the metal and getting the mounting holes right on, but it seems kind
> of
> wasteful to ship it all the way from Germany. If you have someone
> stateside,
> that would be cool. I'd be willing to design some. I have the dual
> psycho-lfo in the files section (schaeffer file).
>
> To keep cost down and be able to fit the larger rotary-switch boards
> in the
> MOTM/Oakley format, you could add more to the module. For the burst
> generator, for example, you could make it 2u wide and add mults, or
> edge
> another board in there -- a psycho lfo (for some crazy clocking?) or a
> dc
> mixer or something from efm or oakley. Make sure the cgs board is on
> the
> right so that any overlap can still fit in the open space on the left
> in the
> adjoining MOTM board -- to make the rotary switch properly aligned,
> there
> will still be overlap on one side; mildly punk rock, but if you're not
>
> opposed to that... :)
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: sasami@...
> Reply-To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
> To: cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cgs_synth] Front Panels
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:55:16 +1100 (EST)
>
> I think it is a good idea. At the time the form factor of the MOTM
> modules
> was being discussed, I was also looking at what form factor to make my
> own
> modules, and was involved in the discussion with Paul, along with
> other SDIY
> members. I came to a descision before Paul, and chose the Moog format,
> with
> the exception that I used 1/8th jacks. I was expeting Paul would adopt
> the
> true moog form also, though instead he went with the slightly narrower
> 1U
> format. He at least did go with the 5U height.
>
> Some of my panel designs would probably transport across pretty
> easilly,
> though of course I need less space for the jacks.
>
> Boards such as the burt generator may cause grief if trying to fit it
> on a
> single 1U panel, as the PCB itself is the width of a moog module. Of
> course,
> if you are prepared to hand wire the switch , there will be no
> problem.
>
> While a lot of my other boards are of the same width, it will not be
> an
> issue, as they can easilly be mounted at 90 degrees to the panel.
>
> Ken
>
> >Hi All
> >
> >What follows is a posting I did to the EFF Support group. But the
> >same idea applies here. While Ken does not supply full kits, there
> is
> >still a need for front panels for the completed modules. So, that
> >being said, is there any interest based on what follows?
> >
> >Since EFM supplies FracRack size blanks with their full kits, I was
> >curious if anyone else was interested in making panels that would be
> >compatible with the MOTM format? I have several MOTM kits, and
> expect
> >to be getting more. Rather than messing with two different panel
> >sizes, and patch cord multiples/format converters, I was thinking of
> >makeing MOTM compatible panels. If there is any interest, maybe some
> >of you would like to help me do the layouts? I have done a little
> >research and there are sources we could piggyback on to get the
> panels
> >made professionally if there is enough interest. Panels would
> probaly
> >end up around USD25 to USD35 each. If we could make 5-10 of a single
> >design, and 3 different designs (i.e. production run of 15 to 30
> >panels total). As with most issues of this type, the major costs are
> >in the setup, so the more panels of the same design made, the lower
> >the cost per panel. Also, in the MOTM format, a normal setup does 3
> >different designs in a single silk screen master.
> >
> >BTW, the intent here is NOT to start a flame war, but to see if there
> >is some interest in this panel size as a common format. I find that
> I
> >get the most use out of systems that have mixed sources. I am also
> >working on some CGS PCB's and I will be looking at the possibility of
> >MOTM format panels for them as well.
> >
> >Thanks all, and I'll look forward to hearing from you. If you wish
> to
> >reply off-list, please feel free to e-mail me: ltroth@...
> >Otherwise, I look forward to seeing how this discussion evolves on
> the
> >list.
> >
> >Larry Troth
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Ken Stone sasami@...
> Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
> Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies
> <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
> See the following URLS for the CGS Modular Synth home page:
> http://198.164.142.50/~cgs/
> http://shokbox.obscure.ca/~cgs/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> cgs_synth-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.