On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:40 PM, John Broski wrote: > Thanks for the quick answer, CD! But there seems to be something > else going on. Here's what I did: > > 1. Printed the TIFF targets (225 patch and grayscale) through > Photoshop, using the Export Module. I made sure the TIFFs had no > imbedded profile. In the module, Output Profile was set to "None > (No Color Correction)". All other color settings in module were set > to default (zero) positions. For good measure, I opened the Print > With Preview box in Photoshop and set Color Handling to "No Color > Management" before opening the module. (Don't know if that matters.) > > 2. Read the patches and built profile in Spyderprint 3 as usual. > > 3. Printed thru the module, choosing my new profile as the Output > Profile. No other changes to any setting in module. > > Result: Just like before! (Colors pale and lifeless, especially > purples and yellows.) The profile made thru the module may well be > a tiny bit different from the one made thru the driver, but it's not > obvious. The result is still obviously different from the print > made thru the driver, though, where colors are fine. > > Any other ideas? Is there perhaps a hidden, low-level profile being > associated with the Canon 5100 somewhere else? Should I delete the > printer's "associated profiles" using Windows? I hear there's an > issue with the Canon module not liking Version 4 ICC profiles > (though it doesn't sound the same... that crashes the module). Are > the Spyderprint 3 profiles Version 4 or 2? Here's one more thing to try. Assign (don't convert! just assign) the GenericRGB profile to the targets in Photoshop before printing using the assign profile menu command. Compare them to your previous targets, and see if they are the same. Then, take the profile you create, convert in Photoshop from your workingspace, to your printer profile using the convert to profile menu command. I'd suggest saturation intent and no BPC, but whatever. Then, once its converted and ready for printing, assign (again. like with the target, don't convert!) the GenericRGB profile. This bit with the generic profile is to make sure that some combination of the OS, the driver, and the Photoshop version aren't triggering an unintended conversion to Generic RGB; if you SAY its already in GenericRGB, then that will save you from unintended color conversions, even if this bug is triggered. If all this works, then printing again, without the Assign GenericRGB step at the end, in case its the conversion in Photoshop in advance of printing thats doing the trick for you, not the assign GenericRGB step. C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging & Home Theater CDTobie@...
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] Re:Canon iPF 5100 Printer Puzzle -- Driver Versus PS Plug-In
2009-02-17 by C D Tobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.