Makes sense that the blood red car printout is better matched with the Canon standard driver if the mid grey has more red and blue in it.
I don't know where to go from here. I do mostly portraits, event photography. I need the capability being able to perform photo editing and matching the print to monitor image as close as possible. Skin tone is of greatest importance to me. The Spyder profiles are not doing that, the standard Canon driver does that. I know everyone will say then use the standa4rd driver, but that's not the intent of a color managed system when using different papers and possibly different inks. I'm getting the Ott-Lite but these prints are normally viewed with tungsten lighting.
I guess that there isn't much more that we can do to correct this monitor/printer mismatch. I spent the last 6 days about 12-14 hours a day on this and there doesn't seem to be any light at the end of the tunnel. In all this effort there still seems to be weak links between monitor calibration systems, and printer profiling measuring systems, papers, inks, etc. Also the monitor is a transmitted light and printer viewing is a reflected light, each with different results and issues.
Maybe I'll have better results with the Canon 9500, but as you mentioned there is going to be a different look when compared to the dye printout.
Well I thank everyone that has participated in this thread and I guess we end it as I don't see where we can go from here.
Thanks again,
Bob P.
At 11:35 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
Your Spyder profile grays aren't quite as neutral as they would be with a pigment printer with multiple grays, but they tend to be within two units of neutral (an excellent printer/paper combo can manage to get them all within one unit of neutral). The Canon canned profiles have a bias towards red (positive a) and a HUGE bias towards blue (negative b). Interesting that these results could be seen as better... The Spyder is definately doing it's job. Oh, and while you see the grays as weak in the Spyder profile, the midgray measures as a bit darker than the Canon midgray; though both are very close to a middle density.
C. D. Tobie
Global Product Technology Mngr.
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor.com
CDTobie@...
On Sep 3, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Bob Petruska <petruska@... > wrote:
Bob, Dave....=
OK, I performed the grey block measurements. Just so we are all clear, these are the grey blocks for the B/W photo with the church and boat.
I first calibrated the Spectro a few times and measured the white disk in the Spectro base.
L 90.24
a -1.05
b -1.16
Canon Photo Paper Pro paper white measurement.
L 95.51
a 0.30
b -2.85
Now the following are the two large grey and black blocks at the bottom to the left of the word datacolor.
Grey.
L 48.28
a 2.13
b 0.52
Black.
L 8.22
a -0.34
b -4.66
I also measured 4 of the grey blocks in the two rows of grey blocks at the bottom.
Top Left
L 91.59
a 0.11
b -1.05
Top Right
L 56.78
a 1.63
b -2.25
Bottom Left
L 50.47
a 1.53
b -1.05
Bottom Right...
L 32.12
a -5.23
b -7.75
I measured the same blocks using the Canon standard driver...
Grey
L 50.84
a 3.17
-b 9.29
Black
L 7.10
a 1.37
b -5.26
Top Left
L 94.89
a 0.73
b -2.48
Top Right
L 54.11
a 2.87
b -8.10
Bottom Left
L 52.77
a 3.16
b -8.66
Bottom Right
L 10.40
a -1.01
b -6.20
The B/W photo on the monitor looks great, neutral, grey.
The Spyder ICC profile print doesn't even look close, more of a weaker grey appearance with an extremely faint tint that looks like it is heading towards red.
The Canon Standard driver print is a very close match with an extremely faint tint heading towards blue.
I also printed out a photo of a blood red car on green grass, the Spyder profile printed more of an orange red and light green grass compared to the monitor image, were the Canon standard driver printed the red car and green grass the correct monitor colors.
Bob, the Canon Pro 9000 has the same 6 inks as the I950 but with two additional red and green inks, sorry no grey.
I hope that all this helps determine where I'm going wrong.
CD, yes the 9500 is probably going to give me more of a match, but most of the people I shoot these photos for want gloss.
Regards,
Bob P.
At 06:21 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
Yes, you can use the larger medium gray patch in the lower left image in SpyderProof, printed directly from Spyder3Print, to check measured neutrality of midtones. Actually, any point in that image will give you a neutrality measurement.
C. D. Tobie
Global Product Technology Mngr.
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor.com
CDTobie@Datacolor.com
On Sep 3, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Bob Petruska <petruska@... > wrote:
Bob S.
What grey color would you like me to measure and how do I do that?
Should I go into Photoshop and make a grey square with designated RGB values?
Then print the square using my Spyder generated profile, then measure using the Spectro?
Thanks,
Bob P.
At 03:17 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com
[ mailto:datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of C D Tobie
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:04 AM
To: datacolor_group@...m
Subject: Re: [datacolor_group] Re: Spyder3Print profiles worse than standard
Canon driver? [1 Attachment]
On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:19 PM, Bob Petruska wrote:
> Ran the same as 2 above, got the same results; printout is slightly
> color saturated, towards red tint, soft-proof slightly washed out
> and fixed it with the soft-proof black level. Canon Standard Driver
> matches the original image very well. I would like to say that this
> printer is one huge printer and I really can't see any printout
> detail differences against the I950.
As for color tint, we really can't talk about that without discussing
what lighting is involved.
Hi CD,
Thanks for monitoring this site the way you do, it is very informative.
As for the tint that Bob P is experiencing, could he measure a grey patch
with the Spyder Spectro and report the results? This would remove any
lighting consideration and maybe give a clue as to how to correct. Or, am I
off base here?
Thanks,
Bob Schoner