Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re: [datacolor_group] Profiling question

2010-02-23 by Jim Miller

CDT

Thanks for the info. 5K did seem a bit of a reach. 6hrs in a
"moderately dim" room today tuning settings wasn't my idea of a good
time.

LR is giving us fits with its printing foibles. I sure hope LR3 fixes
their printing issues. I tried printing the same image with the same
settings using LR2.6, PSCS4 and Qimage today using application managed
color and relative colorimetric intent. PS/Qimage were identical in
their output to my eyes, LR was an outlier.

More work tomorrow to try to track down the differences. We had LR and
PS printing identically a few months ago. No idea what changed.

jtm

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Cdtobie <CDTobie@...> wrote:
> 5000k is quite yellow for use with moderately dim ambient; 5800k would
> be a much more reasonable choice. Instead of hardwiring your display
> calibration to one particular paper, it's much more practical to use
> softproofing to emulate paper white for assorted media as needed. You
> can then tune the tint of the softproof white in your Syder3Print SR
> profiles, to optimize the match.
>
> Unfortunately Lightroom does not offer softproofing; you would have to
> use Photoshop for that, until Lightroom corrects this omission.
>
> C. D. Tobie
> Global Product Technology Mngr.
> Digital Imaging & Home Theater
> Datacolor.com
> CDTobie@...
>
> On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Jim Miller <jim@...> wrote:
>
>> I spent the day trying to achieve a better match between printer and
>> monitor. I'm using S3Elite as part of S3Studio on Vista64 with two
>> Dell 2408WFP monitors. I'm printing on HP Glossy Advance Photo Paper
>> and viewing with Solux D50 lights. Room light is measured by the S3 as
>> "Moderately Low."
>>
>> I created a pure white image and displayed it with Lightroom and
>> compared it to APP under the Solux lights. I found the 6500/2.2
>> monitor profile to be much bluer than the paper.
>>
>> I tried profiling under 5800/2.2 and 5000/2.2 and found that while not
>> perfect the 5K/2.2 was quite close in presenting a "white" that
>> matched that of the paper.
>>
>> Am I doing the right thing in pursuing this sort of match before
>> getting crazy on monitor/printing matching?
>>
>> tnx
>> jtm
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.