I calibrate my LCD monitor to a gamma 0f 2.2 and 5000K.
For print viewing and evaluation I use a D50 standard light
source: "...SoLux 4700K is the light that best simulates the D50
standard..." This is a quote from the solix site. (what else would
they say?)
I researched lighting extensively and arrived at this conclusion as
the best compromise for me. My prints are usually viewed by tungsten
or florescent light, and look good in daylight.
Take a look at the solux site: http://www.solux.net/cgi-
bin/tlistore/infopages/index.html.
I started using their bulbs almost two years ago and I am still using
the original bulbs even though I bought spares. Their light fixtures
can be a bit pricy but they have a couple of inexpensive versions,
one of which I use.
I also calibrate my printer with SpyderPrint3 which does a great job.
i calibrate my monitor with an Eyeone2 and have an older Spyder2 for
backup.
Good luck,
DavidL
--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Miller" <jim@...>
wrote:
>
> Now days it seems most folks profile their LCD monitors at 6500
Kelvin and
> 2.2 gamma.
>
> Assuming a properly calibrated and profiled printer (in my case a
hp9180
> with Spyder3Studio) does it make sense to view the printout in
anything
> other than 6500K light for the truest screen to print match?
>
> Should the monitor be profiled at 5000 Kelvin if that is the
nominal print
> viewing temp?
>
> I would think an accurate printout viewed at 5000K would have a
reddish cast
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> when compared to a 6500K LCD source image.
>
> Educational links welcome if discussion too long.
>
> tnx
> jtm
>