Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Thread

Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-14 by Jim Miller

Now days it seems most folks profile their LCD monitors at 6500 Kelvin and 2.2 gamma. Assuming a properly calibrated and profiled printer (in my case a hp9180 

Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-14 by Mark

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Miller" <jim@...> wrote:

> Should the monitor be profiled at 5000 Kelvin if that is the nominal
print
> viewing temp?
> 

Reliable ref. lighting is a wonderful thing to have and while it can
give you great results in comparing to display it may not be good for
real world conditions where vieing color and brightness are typ
different.  Being able to also view results in lower [different] K and
lux setting could be of benefit depending on the audience you print
for and materials used.

Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-14 by davidl3541

I calibrate my LCD monitor to a gamma 0f 2.2 and 5000K. 

For print viewing and evaluation I use a D50 standard light 
source: "...SoLux 4700K is the light that best simulates the D50 
standard..." This is a quote from the solix site. (what else would 
they say?)

I researched lighting extensively and arrived at this conclusion as 
the best compromise for me. My prints are usually viewed by tungsten 
or florescent light, and look good in daylight.

Take a look at the solux site: http://www.solux.net/cgi-
bin/tlistore/infopages/index.html.

I started using their bulbs almost two years ago and I am still using 
the original bulbs even though I bought spares.  Their light fixtures 
can be a bit pricy but they have a couple of inexpensive versions, 
one of which I use.

I also calibrate my printer with SpyderPrint3 which does a great job. 
i calibrate my monitor with an Eyeone2 and have an older Spyder2 for 
backup.

Good luck,

DavidL


--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Miller" <jim@...> 
wrote:
>
> Now days it seems most folks profile their LCD monitors at 6500 
Kelvin and
> 2.2 gamma.
> 
> Assuming a properly calibrated and profiled printer (in my case a 
hp9180
> with Spyder3Studio) does it make sense to view the printout in 
anything
> other than 6500K light for the truest screen to print match?
> 
> Should the monitor be profiled at 5000 Kelvin if that is the 
nominal print
> viewing temp?
> 
> I would think an accurate printout viewed at 5000K would have a 
reddish cast
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> when compared to a 6500K LCD source image.
> 
> Educational links welcome if discussion too long.
> 
> tnx
> jtm
>

Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-14 by mdgolfbum

Thanks for the Solux pointer. I'll give them a try.

It wasn't clear to me: do each of the fixtures have a transformer in 
them or is the track driven by 12v?

tnx

jtm

RE: [colorvision_group] Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-14 by Davidl3541

Each of the lamp fixtures have a transformer built-in that takes the 115/120
voltage down to 12V.  The fixtures I recommend are their standard utility
all black.  One is a desk type articulated model and the other is a clip on.
I Paid $100 for the desk type including the bulb.  Track lighting was
overkill for me.  I would consider track lighting for a gallery display
setting. 

Regards,

DavidL
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mdgolfbum
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:38 AM
To: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [colorvision_group] Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

Thanks for the Solux pointer. I'll give them a try.

It wasn't clear to me: do each of the fixtures have a transformer in 
them or is the track driven by 12v?

tnx

jtm


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-15 by mdgolfbum

Our "proofing wall" will probably need to be about 2ft by 3ft to 
accomodate a couple of large prints at a time for comparison.

How large a print are you able to proof with your single 50w light?

tnx
jtm

RE: [colorvision_group] Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

2009-01-15 by Davidl3541

I proof 13 X 19" prints (HP B9180 & 8750) and I have two lights, the other
one is a European design Solux that I use as a desk lamp as well.  If you
want to go wider then I would suggest that you build a track light array.  I
just looked at the Solux site and noted that they sell the components to
allow you to build a track system to your own spec.  If you have a very high
ceiling, you might want to take a look at their dual wall mount light setup.
I imagine you could have a series of wall mount lights.  You also might
consider which of the 4700K bulbs you want because they come in different
angles of coverage. My bulbs are 36deg. Since both my lamps are articulated
I can raise or lower to get the desired coverage. Their web page is
solux.net.

Regards,

DavidL
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mdgolfbum
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:25 PM
To: colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [colorvision_group] Re: Monitor colortemp vs Print viewing temp?

Our "proofing wall" will probably need to be about 2ft by 3ft to 
accomodate a couple of large prints at a time for comparison.

How large a print are you able to proof with your single 50w light?

tnx
jtm


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.