Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Thread

Re: [colorvision_group] Digest Number 87

Re: [colorvision_group] Digest Number 87

2006-05-18 by William Du Bois

Would profiling it with PrintFIX PRO be better than nothing or closer 
to a waste of time  (and t-shirts) ?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Screenprinting is not as tightly controlled as offset press, but as 
>long as they are starting with RGB images, then your RGB image of 
>the profiling target will be reasonably representative of the 
>process, and you will get a reasonable screen proof. If they are 
>using CMYK files, then you don't have a straightforward way to 
>profile that with PrintFIX PRO, as its designed to profile RGB 
>processes.
>
>C. David Tobie
>Product Technology Manager
>ColorVision Business Unit
>Datacolor Inc.
>CDTobie@...
>www.colorvision.com

Re: [colorvision_group] Digest Number 87

2006-05-18 by CDTobie@aol.com


In a message dated 5/18/06 12:14:49 PM, dubois@... writes:


Would profiling it with PrintFIX PRO be better than nothing or closer to a waste of time (and t-shirts) ?


Interestingly, its sometimes possible to use printer profiles to proof results, even when you aren't using profiles in the printing process. For instance: in tinted black and white work, where the seperations are actually created with Channel Curves, its still possible to print the PrintFIX PRO target through the same process (channel curves and all), and to then build a profile that can be used to emulate color tints in the prints on screen. The same could be true here, where other methods of seperating channels may be used, but you could get a prediction of the results by proofing through an ICC profile, even though thats not part of the printing process. Certainly worth trying; if the files in question are RGB image files.

C. David Tobie
Product Technology Manager
ColorVision Business Unit
Datacolor Inc.
CDTobie@...

www.colorvision.com

Re: Digest Number 87

2006-05-18 by Tom

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote:
>
> 
> In a message dated 5/18/06 12:14:49 PM, dubois@... writes:
> 
> 
> > Would profiling it with PrintFIX PRO be better than nothing or
closer to a 
> > waste of time  (and t-shirts) ?
> > 
> 
> Interestingly, its sometimes possible to use printer profiles to proof 
> results, even when you aren't using profiles in the printing
process. For instance: 
> in tinted black and white work, where the seperations are actually
created 
> with Channel Curves, its still possible to print the PrintFIX PRO
target through 
> the same process (channel curves and all), and to then build a
profile that 
> can be used to emulate color tints in the prints on screen. The same
could be 
> true here, where other methods of seperating channels may be used,
but you could 
> get a prediction of the results by proofing through an ICC profile,
even 
> though thats not part of the printing process. Certainly worth
trying; if the 
> files in question are RGB image files.
> 
> C. David Tobie
> Product Technology Manager
> ColorVision Business Unit
> Datacolor Inc.
> CDTobie@...
> www.colorvision.com
>


Well ... with the price of gas at $3 per gallon and considering your
most valuable asset is people's time .. the potential gain may
outweigh your risk factors.  It sounds like something similar has been
done before so that makes the risk even smaller.

If you do decide to try it let us know how it goes!

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.