Okay... To wrap this up: I think the best thing for me to do is to use GNMIDI and edit/set BOTH volume and velocity to 80 (or something less than 100). Thanks for the attention this thread has rec'd! --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, "George F. Litterst" <PianoBench@...> wrote: > > Good evening, everyone. > > Regarding the message below from yadidisklavier: > > We are talking about 2 completely different volume control issues: > > (1) It is true that you can reduce the volume of the piano using the > control unit or the remote control for your Disklavier. Internally, > the instrument reduces the hammer velocities little by little as you > reduce the volume setting. At some point, it engages the left pedal > which moves the hammers closer to the strings thus reducing the > hammer velocities even further. > > (2) In my post, I was refering to a MIDI message in the the file > itself called "controller 7" or "volume." The possible value ranges > for this message are 0 to 127. The normal setting for this parameter > is 100 for a Disklavier piano. Early Disklaviers (I think Mark II and > before) paid no attention to this message. > > Your instrument is actually a Mark IIXG and it does pay attention to > the controller 7 MIDI message. However, you will not be able to > change the controller 7 value without editing the file itself. > > Regrettably, many MIDI files found on the Internet have the > controller 7 value set rather high. In addition, the note-on > velocities may be quite high. The result is that the file is much too > loud when played on the Disklavier. > > Regards, > PianoBench > > > On Jan 17, 2007, at 6:17 PM, yadidisklavier wrote: > > > My Mark II responds to volume with the dampening pedal (far left). > > Is this going to have a different effect than velocity message? I'm > > afraid this is a whole new can of worms for me. > > > > --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, "George F. Litterst" > > <PianoBench@> wrote: > > > > > > Good afternoon, everyone. > > > > > > If memory serves me correctly, the Mark II does not respond to > > volume > > > control (controller 7) messages. It does, of course, respond to > > note- > > > on velocity messages. > > > > > > I think that controller 7 was first implemented in the Mark IIXG. > > > > > > Regards, > > > PianoBench > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 2007, at 5:06 PM, James Fry wrote: > > > > > > > I haven't used this tool, but I suspect you want to reduce the > > > > velocities, as this is the individual note loudness. I would > > expect > > > > the > > > > volume control to insert controller 7 messages, which I think > > will > > > > have > > > > the same effect as adjusting the volume control on the piano > > control > > > > unit (on my MPX1Z Mark II this puts the "soft" pedal down) > > > > > > > > Give it a try and see what happens I guess! > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > yadidisklavier wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I know that this has been addressed many times by the group > > over the > > > > > years, but unfortunately, all of the posts have only led to more > > > > > confusion for me. Please help me by clarify? > > > > > > > > > > I recently purchased an MX100II Mark II. From previous pianos, I > > > > > already understand what happens to hammers from constant > > pounding. > > > > > > > > > > I recently purchased GNMIDI so I could batch convert midi files > > and > > > > > make them appropriate for the DKV. In the GNMIDI convert volume > > > > > function, the software gives two choices (radio buttons), one is > > > > > for "volume" and the other is for "velocity". There is a > > > > "percentage" > > > > > choice as well..this is self explanatory and an I believe I > > want a > > > > > value of 80% or less. > > > > > > > > > > Since I don't want to flat line velocity performance within a > > song, > > > > > should I just be selecting the "volume" option? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Velocity or Volume?...I must stop the pounding! GNMIDI
2007-01-18 by yadidisklavier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.