dkc500rxg
2013-08-30 by <fracture@...>
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
Thread
dkc500rxg
RE: dkc500rxg
2013-08-31 by <rightnightboy@...>
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-08-31 by fracture
I purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.
Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@hotmail.com
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-01 by fracture
I have to test the theory first. But will keep u advised. Need to find a dkc500rxg controller first.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: Dan Waxer <zed123@adelphia.net>
Date: 08/31/2013 10:56 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it
directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you
have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor.
Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my
Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by
using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its
usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II
still be used via midi?
I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I
had never heard of this option before.
Thanks.
Dan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----From: fractureSent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AMSubject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxgI purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@hotmail.com
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-01 by Dan Waxer
I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor. Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi? I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before. Thanks. Dan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: fracture
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AM
Subject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
I purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.
Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@...
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-11 by <jmorris651@...>
I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general.
I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850.
Joe
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote:
I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it
directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you
have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor.
Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my
Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by
using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its
usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II
still be used via midi?
I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I
had never heard of this option before.
Thanks.
Dan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----From: fractureSent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AMSubject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxgI purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@...
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-12 by Donal Galvin
Would you not keep the box for calibration and maintenance ? Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 11 Sep 2013, at 18:59, jmorris651@... wrote: > I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general. > > > > I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850. > > > > Joe > > > > --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote: > > > I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor. > Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi? > > I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before. > > Thanks. > > Dan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: fracture > To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AM > Subject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg > > I purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio. > Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio. > > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4 > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: rightnightboy@... > Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg > > > > Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ? > > > > --- In disklavier@...m, <fracture@...> wrote: > > Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week. > >
RE: RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-12 by <fracture@...>
just a little late. just purchased the last one through yamaha. read the save the controller step in the manual but shouldn't the dkc850 have a maintaince moode instead.
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <disklavier@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general.
I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850.
Joe
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote:I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor.Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi?I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before.Thanks.Dan----- Original Message -----From: fractureSent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AMSubject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxgI purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@...
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-13 by Bill Brandom
I would keep the control unit, even though calibration can be done through the DKC-850. Bill Sent from my iPhone. On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:53 PM, Donal Galvin <discodonal@...> wrote: Would you not keep the box for calibration and maintenance ? Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 11 Sep 2013, at 18:59, jmorris651@... wrote: > > I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general. > > > > I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850. > > > > Joe > > > > --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote: > > > I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor. > Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi? > > I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before. > > Thanks. > > Dan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: fracture > To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AM > Subject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg > > I purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio. > Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio. > > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4 > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: rightnightboy@... > Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg > > > > Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ? > > > > --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote: > > Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week. >
RE: Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-17 by <jmorris651@...>
Hi Bill, Can you please explain the reasoning why I would want to keep the XG control box? I would appreciate it.
Thanks
Joe
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <disklavier@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I would keep the control unit, even though calibration can be done through the DKC-850.
Sent from my iPhone.
Bill
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:53 PM, Donal Galvin <discodonal@...> wrote:
Would you not keep the box for calibration and maintenance ?
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general.
I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850.
Joe
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote:I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor.Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi?I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before.Thanks.Dan----- Original Message -----From: fractureSent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AMSubject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxgI purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@...
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.
Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-18 by Bill Gmail
Hi Joe, I am not sure I can explain why you would want to keep your DKC500RXG control unit. Your Disklavier can be calibrated using the DKC-850. So your old control unit is not needed for this purpose. I have a couple of reasons I would keep the original control unit: - If I ever sold my MarkIIXG Disklavier, I would want to have my "original equipment' to supply with the piano. - If I had a failure with my DKC-850 and I was having a Disklavier party at my home that night, I could easily re-connect the original control unit and have a great party. - I am a technology hoarder. It is difficult for me to get rid of "stuff" such as this. I hope this information helps! Bill Sent from my iPad
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Sep 17, 2013, at 8:44 AM, <jmorris651@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bill, Can you please explain the reasoning why I would want to keep the XG control box? I would appreciate it. > > > > Thanks > > > > Joe > > > > --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <disklavier@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > I would keep the control unit, even though calibration can be done through the DKC-850. > > Bill > > Sent from my iPhone. > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:53 PM, Donal Galvin <discodonal@...> wrote: > > > Would you not keep the box for calibration and maintenance ? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 11 Sep 2013, at 18:59, jmorris651@... wrote: > >> >> I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general. >> >> >> >> I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850. >> >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote: >> >> >> I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor. >> Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi? >> >> I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Dan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: fracture >> To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AM >> Subject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg >> >> I purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio. >> Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio. >> >> >> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4 >> >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: rightnightboy@... >> Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00) >> To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg >> >> >> >> Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ? >> >> >> >> --- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote: >> >> Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week. >> > > > Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (10) > RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 1 > Visit Your Group > To Post a message to the group, send it to: disklavier@... > > To Post a private message to Todd Muncy, the group's founder and moderator, send it to: > disklavier-owner@... > > To reach our group's web site go to: > http://Yahoogroups.com/group/disklavier > > THINKING OF LEAVING THE GROUP? > If you are thinking of unsubcribing because you are getting too much mail, go the the web site and change your email delivery option instead. That will fix the problem, while maintaining your access to the group. If you insist on leaving us completely send a blank email to: > disklavier-unsubscribe@yahooGroups.com > > Know someone who wants to join? Have them send a blank email to: > disklavier-subscribe@... or give them this link: > http://Yahoogroups.com/group/disklavier/join
Re: [disklavier] RE: RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-20 by Dan Waxer
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: fracture@...
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 3:08 PM
Subject: [disklavier] RE: RE: dkc500rxg
just a little late. just purchased the last one through yamaha. read the save the controller step in the manual but shouldn't the dkc850 have a maintaince moode instead.
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <disklavier@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general.
I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850.
Joe
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote:
I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor.
Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi?
I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before.
Thanks.
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: fracture
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AM
Subject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
I purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.
Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@...
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.RE: Re: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
2013-09-20 by <sjhart110@...>
I also believe only the original controller can update the firmware of the on board keyboard controller. I updated all of mine before installing the DKC850 and further keyboard firmware is very unlikely for older models. SJ
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <disklavier@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Hi Joe,
I am not sure I can explain why you would want to keep your DKC500RXG control unit.
Your Disklavier can be calibrated using the DKC-850. So your old control unit is not needed for this purpose.
I have a couple of reasons I would keep the original control unit:
- If I ever sold my MarkIIXG Disklavier, I would want to have my "original equipment' to supply with the piano.
- If I had a failure with my DKC-850 and I was having a Disklavier party at my home that night, I could easily re-connect the original control unit and have a great party.
- I am a technology hoarder. It is difficult for me to get rid of "stuff" such as this.
I hope this information helps!
Bill
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 17, 2013, at 8:44 AM, <jmorris651@...> wrote:
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (10)Hi Bill, Can you please explain the reasoning why I would want to keep the XG control box? I would appreciate it.
Thanks
Joe
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <disklavier@yahoogroups.com> wrote:I would keep the control unit, even though calibration can be done through the DKC-850.BillSent from my iPhone.
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:53 PM, Donal Galvin <discodonal@...> wrote:Would you not keep the box for calibration and maintenance ?
Sent from my iPhoneI apologize if this message is inappropriate or incorrect as I am brand new to this group and am also new to Yahoo Groups in general.
I will shortly have a DKC500RXG controller available as I just ordered the DKC850.
Joe
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <zed123@...> wrote:I have a Mark II and I would love to connect it directly to a DKC850 without using the midi cables, which is what I believe you have been able to do with the 9 to 15 pin adaptor.Can you please tell me what I need to do to make my Mark II be like a Mark IIXG that can be controlled directly by the DKC850 by using the 9 to 15 pin adaptor instead of the midi cables which would limit its usefullness, and it would require that the DKC100 controller for the Mark II still be used via midi?I appreciate as much detail as you can give since I had never heard of this option before.Thanks.Dan----- Original Message -----From: fractureSent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:21 AMSubject: RE: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxgI purchased the 9 to 15 pin adaptor and the hammer sensor board to update my mark ii to a iixg but I need a 500 controller to write to the new hammer sensor board and pk Ctrl boards. A that time I will purchase the Dkc 850. Which will compete the update and allow Internet radio.Essentially I am updating my mark ii to a iixg and then updating to 850. Will not have silent play or smart keys but will have Internet and Internet radio.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S®4
-------- Original message --------
From: rightnightboy@...
Date: 08/31/2013 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: disklavier@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [disklavier] RE: dkc500rxg
Hi, do you have a markII or a markIIxg ? The latter allows I believe, the internet radio option of the DKC850 (I have it installed on my mpx1 wich is initially with DKC500R and MarkIIXG silent . For which purpose do you wish to have an xg controller for a week ?
--- In disklavier@yahoogroups.com, <fracture@...> wrote:
Seems the dkc 850 will not get internet radio on my Mark ii. So does anyone have and old dkc500rxg (Mark iixg) controller that has be upgraded that I might be able to purchase or borrow for a week.