Personally, I'd recommend using the reverse lettering (white block/blank lettering) as John suggested. Monochrome is more consistent with the Moog aesthetic (if that's important to you) than colored text, and I think the yellow would be hard to discern in a performance situation anyway. Unless you're on a brightly lit stage, I'll bet yellow and white will look much the same. I do like the color-coding though, so if adhering to a traditional Moog aesthetic is ~not~ one of your aims, I think it's a great idea. Hope that feedback is helpful. : ) ty _______________ <http://sublevel9.net> http://sublevel9.net From: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jburdick727 Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 9:17 AM To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dotcomformat] Re: Polymoog Resonator in Dotcom Format Actually, it shows up a lot "brighter" than it really is. Its like a mustard yellow. I would be happy not to print it as its a second press run for each panel with a 24Hr. drying period between runs. I think it looks cool sitting in among the other modules, though. I am encouraged to try using color on other modules like the sequencer which has many operating modes and will require some kind of visual guidance for the user to make it more intuitive to operate. And while I don't think there are a major number of users of analog modular synths in live settings, anything that can be done to enhance the visual usage aspects would be valuable, I would think. I will make panels any way people want but its going to cost more. In order to sell a module for $200, though, I have to have a panel that costs less than $10 and thats if I commit $1K for a panel run. In order to make an individual panel with individual characteristics, I need to offset the cost of my time (not necessarily in dollars but in the delays it causes to other projects like the MIDI/CV and the sequencer, itself an up to five panel affair) so I need to get more up front. As I get more into the manufacturing aspects of these modules, my mind is boggled by how people like the Arricks can charge so little for them. It doesn't make much difference what the function of the module is, either. The major costs are in the panels, jacks, knobs, boards and those really expensive standoffs, all things that every module needs. However, I always appreciate the feedback so keep it coming. --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com <mailto:dotcomformat%40yahoogroups.com> , "John L Rice" <Drummer@...> wrote: > > > Yeah, I agree with Ty. The yellow will really stand out, especially in an > all Moog rig. Maybe a very pale yellow or . . .a white/blank block with > black lettering (reverse lettering) might have been preferable? > > John > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com <mailto:dotcomformat%40yahoogroups.com> > > [mailto:dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com <mailto:dotcomformat%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of tyhodson > > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 11:00 PM > > To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com <mailto:dotcomformat%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [dotcomformat] Re: Polymoog Resonator in Dotcom Format > > > > Looks really nice! I really like the color coding, although if I had to > > nit-pick anything it would be the color coding -- since the Moog format > > has sort of a monochromatic "thing" going. Still, nicely done! > > > > ty > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [dotcomformat] Re: Polymoog Resonator in Dotcom Format
2010-06-28 by ty hodson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.