--- Niklas Winde <Gordon_Stryph@Hotmail.com> wrote: > Shall we decide on a batch of three then or wait a few weeks more? > Or better yet, if you could do these in July Larry, just go ahead > and do as many as you have orders for by then. I only run them all at opnce. So, when I get ready to take orders, I just open up for orders for 2 or 3 weeks and print whatever is ordered. > I guess we should agree on a design right? Can the one for MOTM be > adopted or do we need to redesign it totally? We need to agree on a design. I am attaching photos (sorry if this offends anyone) of one in MOTM format. That will give y9ou some ideas. However, remember that you have some differences. The size of typical dot com pots and spacing only permits one row of jacks up der the pots. But, the wider panel provides for jacks up one side of the panel like the wave-multiplier panel (also attached). To stay with that typical dot com theme, I think I would put the ADSR pots on the left side with jacks beside each pot for the voltage control inputs, and put the other controls on the right, leaving a row of 4 jacks below. Larry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Blacet EG, Arrick format
2005-06-10 by Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.