Dotcomformat

hey moe,
haven't been keeping up with these lists, after i posted that i read
some of the stuff over on the MOTM list, very sorry to hear about Paul
H. so yea, certainly understandable.


if i remember, the original plan was just Stooge making & screening
the panels, then sending them to Paul S @ MOTM to assemble, dunno if
he's interested in that anymore.

but i'm sure if the Stooges simply made the panels for dot-commers to
make kits, there'd be considerable demand as well. dot-com seems to
have more non-DIY people than other brands, but there's still a lot of
people who are making their own modules and doing kits. i'd certainly
still be getting some panels made & purchasing kits, i'd just have to
find some fellow dot-com lister to do some assembly for me. and maybe
paul would consider doing dot-com versions of non-kit modules like the
forthcoming cloud generator?

anyway, thanks for the response.

best,
ed


--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote:
>
> Ed,
> 
> Given all that has happened in stooge land this past year, I would say
> that the chance of being able to buy assembled MOTM modules in dot com
> format is very low (unless somebody else can take it on).
> 
> The design and assembly necessary is beyond what I can take on. If
> silkscreened panels were made available, what do you suppose the level
> of interest would be from dot commers to rolling their own module
> conversions?
> 
> Moe
> 
> --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "seven_arts112" <sevenarts@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering, are Stooge Industries & MOTM still going ahead with
> > that old plan to do MOTM modules with dot-com faceplates? I'd love to
> > get my hands on the Suboctave Mux, the 390 dual LFO, and eventually
> > the Cloud Generator (!!!). I realize of course everyone involved is
> > busy & i'm sure that's not priority #1, but i'm sure i would be far
> > from the only one excited to see this happen soon.
> > 
> > best,
> > ed
> >
>