Yahoo Groups archive

Dotcomformat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Thread

MOTM in dot-com format?

MOTM in dot-com format?

2006-04-30 by seven_arts112

Just wondering, are Stooge Industries & MOTM still going ahead with
that old plan to do MOTM modules with dot-com faceplates? I'd love to
get my hands on the Suboctave Mux, the 390 dual LFO, and eventually
the Cloud Generator (!!!). I realize of course everyone involved is
busy & i'm sure that's not priority #1, but i'm sure i would be far
from the only one excited to see this happen soon.

best,
ed

Re: MOTM in dot-com format?

2006-04-30 by mate_stubb

Ed,

Given all that has happened in stooge land this past year, I would say
that the chance of being able to buy assembled MOTM modules in dot com
format is very low (unless somebody else can take it on).

The design and assembly necessary is beyond what I can take on. If
silkscreened panels were made available, what do you suppose the level
of interest would be from dot commers to rolling their own module
conversions?

Moe

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "seven_arts112" <sevenarts@...>
wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Just wondering, are Stooge Industries & MOTM still going ahead with
> that old plan to do MOTM modules with dot-com faceplates? I'd love to
> get my hands on the Suboctave Mux, the 390 dual LFO, and eventually
> the Cloud Generator (!!!). I realize of course everyone involved is
> busy & i'm sure that's not priority #1, but i'm sure i would be far
> from the only one excited to see this happen soon.
> 
> best,
> ed
>

Re: MOTM in dot-com format?

2006-05-01 by seven_arts112

hey moe,
haven't been keeping up with these lists, after i posted that i read
some of the stuff over on the MOTM list, very sorry to hear about Paul
H. so yea, certainly understandable.


if i remember, the original plan was just Stooge making & screening
the panels, then sending them to Paul S @ MOTM to assemble, dunno if
he's interested in that anymore.

but i'm sure if the Stooges simply made the panels for dot-commers to
make kits, there'd be considerable demand as well. dot-com seems to
have more non-DIY people than other brands, but there's still a lot of
people who are making their own modules and doing kits. i'd certainly
still be getting some panels made & purchasing kits, i'd just have to
find some fellow dot-com lister to do some assembly for me. and maybe
paul would consider doing dot-com versions of non-kit modules like the
forthcoming cloud generator?

anyway, thanks for the response.

best,
ed


--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Ed,
> 
> Given all that has happened in stooge land this past year, I would say
> that the chance of being able to buy assembled MOTM modules in dot com
> format is very low (unless somebody else can take it on).
> 
> The design and assembly necessary is beyond what I can take on. If
> silkscreened panels were made available, what do you suppose the level
> of interest would be from dot commers to rolling their own module
> conversions?
> 
> Moe
> 
> --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "seven_arts112" <sevenarts@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering, are Stooge Industries & MOTM still going ahead with
> > that old plan to do MOTM modules with dot-com faceplates? I'd love to
> > get my hands on the Suboctave Mux, the 390 dual LFO, and eventually
> > the Cloud Generator (!!!). I realize of course everyone involved is
> > busy & i'm sure that's not priority #1, but i'm sure i would be far
> > from the only one excited to see this happen soon.
> > 
> > best,
> > ed
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.