Dotcomformat

Hi

I second Paul. I have both DOTCOM (88 system) and COTK systems (set  
up close to that of Paul)
and I am happy with both.
COTK is no ripp off at all. The building quality of the COTK module  
is comparable or even
better than Synthesizers.com (and Synthesizers.com is good value).
The two only drawbacks are i) it is hard to communicate wit the COTK  
people and ii) the
currency balance makes COTK expansive for USA customers but this last  
point is no big deal
since US people can easily buy DOTCOM which, I repeat, is good value.


All the best

Yves

Le 9 avr. 08 à 12:19, Paul Schmidt a écrit :
> COTK makes very nice modules, in fact they have developed more new  
> modules in the past two years than any other synthesizer manufacture.
> In the beginning COTK may of had a rocky start but these days they  
> are one of the top profesinal synthesizer manufactures in the  
> world. They don't run their business in such a progressive manner  
> as dotcom, thier is little to know support, no user groups. Getting  
> hold of some one at COTK to take an order or answer a question  
> takes time and persistence, it takes a long time for responses  
> sometimes. Delivery isn't that bad when compaired to MOTM, anywhere  
> between 2 weeks to 8 months depending on the module. But their  
> products are fun, unique, and musical.
> I don't see COTK as a threat to the DotCom but more of a complement  
> to such a great synthesizer. I've been told that COTK isn't  
> interested in selling huge numbers of synthesizers, or even sell at  
> all in the north american market, they just want to produce the  
> most Moog like clones to a Doepfer drenched microsynth Europe.



-------------------------------------------------
Yves Usson
email :       yves.usson@yusynth.net
web site :    http://yusynth.net