Dotcomformat

>Yeah, but modding isn't exactly up to everyones skill level. And the lack 
>of
>reversible inputs makes the need for an external attenuator necessary.

This is true. However, most reversing issues can be handled with other 
modules, the distributor and sig. processor springs to mind. I agree that 
reversible inputs would be a lot better though. Maybe one could get them 
from Peter Grenader? I think he has something like that available.

But no one really has to mod their modules if we go with your design do 
they? If we leave out the line it might be a bit confusing but getting the 
LED stuff through the switch can't be any harder than building the rest of 
the kit can it? Hmm, maybe I'm missing something?

>The Oakley VCADSR may be a better fit than the Blacet for DotCom users 
>since
>people could just buy a prepopulated board and slip it in a panel without
>too much difficulty.

To me the Oakley module is uninteresting as it has too bad time spec, I 
personally want the Blacet with it's extremely long times and I also want 
it's LFO function. Even though I agree with Rogers philosophy about VCOs and 
LFOs, the Q106 just doesn't go slow enough.

/Niklas

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/