Yahoo Groups archive

Dotcomformat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Thread

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by phineousbonemachine

> 
> i'm sure this had been a thread on many a list, but is it 
ridiculous to do a poly synth on a modern modular platform? i guess 
if you want traditional structure VCO-VCF-VCA, you have to have all 
three for each voice. gets expensive and big quickly.
> 

Well the plans for the dotcom are to have 110+ system with three 
sounds at once.

one sound sequenced, one sound set up as arppeg, and one set up 
as lead. 

so basically yes it is three seperate 3osc mono synths. so yes the 
polydac module makes alot of sense to me as far as creating the three 
note chord.

l8r

P

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by phineousbonemachine

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo <contact@...> wrote:
>
> As far as modulars, I wouldn't do it for _pads_. There are a million 
> old and new synths that will do it a lot less painfully and less 
> expensively. 

exactally....thus me question. I want a modern poly analog synth. Pads 
being its primary job, but not limited to.

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by phineousbonemachine

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Erik Ribeiro <djxpat@...> wrote:


 
> oh, and of course there is the hardSID 4U. it's VSTi and a weirdo 
hydrid digital/analog. you need a computer to run it, but at least it's 
USB and small for touring. the SID chips have a very high noise floor, 
but the noise and artifacts are very interesting (6581). the 4U i think 
goes to great lengths to reduce unwanted noise. it also produced some 
really mean sounds. if you buy 4 SID chips, that's 12 voices. 
unfortunately, the euro-dollar conversion is crazy now, so the 300 euro 
version will set you back over $500 without SID chips.
> 


SID chips are literally extinct last time I checked.

fetch quite a price on ebay.....and no guarantee that they function.

Re: [dotcomformat] Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by Erik Ribeiro

how could i forget the PEK? actually, i have no experience with it at all, but i've really wanted to check one out. i'm also really interested in the LL electronics rozzbox.  andromeda seems like the one for the  pads.

i will own a prophet 08... eventually. it doesn't have a broad range like the A6, but it does the kinds of sounds i like. forget calibrating. i think both use chips, which limit the kind of work a tech could do. i'm sure there's facility for tuning.

the big problem i have with most poly synths is that they are islands. yes, there's MIDI, but little if any CV. usually only filter inputs. even the SE stuff no longer offers CV ins or outs. that reminds me, i really like the sound of the vermona perFOURmer. it's only 4 voice and somewhat limited. but i still like its sound.

oh, and of course there is the hardSID 4U. it's VSTi and a weirdo hydrid digital/analog. you need a computer to run it, but at least it's USB and small for touring. the SID chips have a very high noise floor, but the noise and artifacts are very interesting (6581). the 4U i think goes to great lengths to reduce unwanted noise. it also produced some really mean sounds. if you buy 4 SID chips, that's 12 voices. unfortunately, the euro-dollar conversion is crazy now, so the 300 euro version will set you back over $500 without SID chips.

anybody have a sunsyn or other modern poly analog synths?

i'm sure this had been a thread on many a list, but is it ridiculous to do a poly synth on a modern modular platform? i guess if you want traditional structure VCO-VCF-VCA, you have to have all three for each voice. gets expensive and big quickly.

erik 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----
From: phineousbonemachine <berticus_sledge@hotmail.com>
To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:15:14 AM
Subject: [dotcomformat] Poly analog pads (the big question)


OK I love my dotcom, but I have 4 digisynths right now. 

Yamaha Cs1x...first synth bought at a pawnshop for 125bucks.

Yamaha Cs6r...fun machine lots of wave forms to play with.

Novation x-station25. core of my small home demo rig. if you know 
what it is then you know.......great controller.

Novation nova...I absolutly LOVE this little guy, and plan on buying 
a supernova rack. I highly advise borrowing one for a weekend, fun 
fun.

But, I want to add a poly analog synth to my setup.

Here is the big question:

I want polyphonic analog pads, with midi capabilites. 
(synths like the roland mks-80 are great, but I want modern 
stability. Trips to the tech for calibration is not an option.

So wich one?

Andromeda (such a fine beast),

Prophet 08 (nice sounds and great onboard sequencing features),

dave smith PEK?? (wonderfull marriage of the old and new! totally 
unique) 
keys or rack, either is fine.

I just can't make up my mind.

pros?....cons? 

maybe some other suggestions?

and on a side note,

If I had the modules for 3 seperate sounds at once on the 
dotcom.....what would I use to enable chord tracking? Thee age old 
question =).

If someone out there knows of something with CV outs and ins that 
would be a plus!

I find that I am constantly jamming with me dotcom (once the 960 gets 
here I fear I will become a recluse LOL)

My nova is my main jamming tool..once I create a sound, I hop on the 
dotcom and retro-engineer it!  =) till I die this will remain my 
favorite time sink.

I dont use me other synths all that much anymore.

Time for a studio upgrade.

Message boards have been slow due to the weekend so consider this 
some food for thought.

any and all suggestions will be considered since this fall I am going 
to buy one.

This post is all about gaining knowledge from those who have some or 
all of these said boards and what they prefer in an analog poly.

TY in advance

l8r

P

Re: [dotcomformat] Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by Scott Deyo

As far as modulars, I wouldn't do it for _pads_. There are a million 
old and new synths that will do it a lot less painfully and less 
expensively. For a minimal four-voice pad, you'd need 8 VCOs, 4 VCFs, 8 
VCADSRs (if you wanted to be able to tweak the patch live at least), 4 
VCAs, and any modulation sources. I stick to old, high-upkeep beasts -- 
Korg DSS-1 ("The Limo"), Poly-Six. Nothing but lowpass is my only 
sadness.
: )

If you wanted atypical pads, or to get experimental w/ them, then 
modulars make sense. And it's so much fun!

Scott Deyo
The Bridechamber
contact@bridechamber.com
http://www.bridechamber.com
Jealous Edison Record Kompany
http://www.jealousedison.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On May 27, 2008, at 8:54 PM, Erik Ribeiro wrote:

> how could i forget the PEK? actually, i have no experience with it at 
> all, but i've really wanted to check one out. i'm also really 
> interested in the LL electronics rozzbox.  andromeda seems like the 
> one for the  pads.
>
> i will own a prophet 08... eventually. it doesn't have a broad range 
> like the A6, but it does the kinds of sounds i like. forget 
> calibrating. i think both use chips, which limit the kind of work a 
> tech could do. i'm sure there's facility for tuning.
>
> the big problem i have with most poly synths is that they are islands. 
> yes, there's MIDI, but little if any CV. usually only filter inputs. 
> even the SE stuff no longer offers CV ins or outs. that reminds me, i 
> really like the sound  of the vermona perFOURmer. it's only 4 voice 
> and somewhat limited. but i still like its sound.
>
> oh, and of course there is the hardSID 4U. it's VSTi and a weirdo 
> hydrid digital/analog. you need a computer to run it, but at least 
> it's USB and small for touring. the SID chips have a very high noise 
> floor, but the noise and artifacts are very interesting (6581). the 4U 
> i think goes to great lengths to reduce unwanted noise. it also 
> produced some really mean sounds. if you buy 4 SID chips, that's 12 
> voices. unfortunately, the euro-dollar conversion is crazy now, so the 
> 300 euro version will set you back over $500 without SID chips.
>
> anybody have a sunsyn or other modern poly analog synths?
>
> i'm sure this had been a thread on many a list, but is it ridiculous 
> to do a poly synth on a modern modular platform? i guess if you want 
> traditional structure VCO-VCF-VCA, you have to have all three for each 
> voice. gets expensive and big  quickly.
>
> erik
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: phineousbonemachine <berticus_sledge@hotmail.com>
> To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:15:14 AM
> Subject: [dotcomformat] Poly analog pads (the big question)
>
>
> OK I love my dotcom, but I have 4 digisynths right now.
>
>  Yamaha Cs1x...first synth bought at a pawnshop for 125bucks.
>
>  Yamaha Cs6r...fun machine lots of wave forms to play with.
>
>  Novation x-station25. core of my small home demo rig. if you know
>  what it is then you know.......great controller.
>
>  Novation nova...I absolutly LOVE this little guy, and plan on buying
>  a supernova rack. I highly advise borrowing one for a weekend, fun
>  fun.
>
>  But, I want to add a poly analog synth to my setup.
>
>  Here is the big question:
>
>  I want polyphonic analog pads, with midi capabilites.
>  (synths like the roland mks-80 are great, but I want modern
>  stability. Trips to the tech for calibration is not an option.
>
>  So wich one?
>
>  Andromeda (such a fine beast),
>
>  Prophet 08 (nice sounds and great onboard sequencing features),
>
>  dave smith PEK?? (wonderfull marriage of the old and new! totally
>  unique)
>  keys or rack, either is fine.
>
>  I just can't make up my mind.
>
>  pros?....cons?
>
>  maybe some other suggestions?
>
>  and on a side note,
>
>  If I had the modules for 3 seperate sounds at once on the
>  dotcom.....what would I use to enable chord tracking? Thee age old
>  question =).
>
>  If someone out there knows of something with CV outs and ins that
>  would be a plus!
>
>  I find that I am constantly jamming with me dotcom (once the 960 gets
>  here I fear I will become a recluse LOL)
>
>  My nova is my main jamming tool..once I create a sound, I hop on the
>  dotcom and retro-engineer it! =) till I die this will remain my
>  favorite time sink.
>
>  I dont use me other synths all that much anymore.
>
>  Time for a studio upgrade.
>
>  Message boards have been slow due to the weekend so consider this
>  some food for thought.
>
>  any and all suggestions will be considered since this fall I am going
>  to buy one.
>
>  This post is all about gaining knowledge from those who have some or
>  all of these said boards and what they prefer in an analog poly.
>
>  TY in advance
>
>  l8r
>
>  P
>
>
>  
>

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by klstay

Since you plan on putting together a 3 voice .com rig anyway the 
questions are:

A) Would 3 note chords satisfy you?

B) Would not having any patch memory be OK for your pad machine?

Even VERY minimally set up you could do pads with a poly MIDI 
interface, 3 VCOs, VCF, VCA, EG by just using one of the 3 gates from 
the MIDI DAC. Only  on CV for keyboard tracking, but with single hand 
chording that would generally not be too far off for any of the notes.

Since you are building a 3 voice system anyway then the hurdle for 
real 3 note pads becomes filters. I could see having 2 Q107s and a 
Q150 in a system, but 3 Q107s is pushing it. Still, if the pads you 
could get from that would suffice given the limitations then you also 
get all the lack of limitations from being a real modular.

(From what I read of the Mankato I could maybe see having 3 of them 
in a system and it being more or less your 'main' filter. Of course 
until I get enough pennies saved up to get one for real...)

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "phineousbonemachine" 
<berticus_sledge@...> wrote:
>
> --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo <contact@> wrote:
> >
> > As far as modulars, I wouldn't do it for _pads_. There are a 
million 
> > old and new synths that will do it a lot less painfully and less 
> > expensively. 
> 
> exactally....thus me question. I want a modern poly analog synth. 
Pads 
> being its primary job, but not limited to.
>

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by ~Morbius~

Ya know... I have hesitated to bring this up. For one thing, I'm not convinced that this is a direction you are interested in, and also, the cost may exceed what you're willing to go for.... but-
In my quest for my primary keyboard/synth/midi production center/sampler, etc. and so on... (basically, one device that would do nearly everything I needed, without having X number of pieces of equipment everywhere).... I ended-up buying a Yamaha Motif ES-8. Now hang on... lemme get to the part about thick pads-n-sh!t, in a moment....
One of the things I do is to sample my dotcom modulars.... plus, there are samples of all sorts of 'stuff', from instruments, old analog synths, strings, brass, guitars pecussion, vocals/vox.... you name it... it's there... and like I said, you can easily do your own. The great thing is, you can assign up to four different sounds/samples to play at once, as well as assign up to four different zones to play from on the keyboard. By sampling whatever kind or type of analog modular sounds I want, I can save those as presets, and call them up whenever I want. I can sample actual synth-temporal events (did I just make-up a new phrase???) .... like a running sequencer... and if I want, the sampler will chop-up each note and save it as a midi-event... or sample a LP filter/high resonance thing.... whatever I want, and the sampler can trim and loop these sounds if I want.... or- sample an unfiltered sound, and use the onboard analog or digital filters (of any type)(12/18/24db), and apply the onboard EG's to the onboard filters and VCA's.... so that basically, the original osc.-sound is dotcom, but the rest is Yami. And- you can assign up to four knobs for real-time control over whatever parameters you want. If you do about four different samples, at four different octaves, you eliminate the pitch-time variable.
So imagine... sampling your dotcom... just a sound/note.... and saving four different variations of that one sample... alter them... filter(s), EG's, VCA's, pitch/tuning, effects (phase/flange/reverb/panning... anything).... all of it for each one of the four samples... and it's all saved as one sound to be called-up as a preset, instantly. And- the ES's osc.s aren't at all shabby. In fact, some of the factory samples are taken from the old 'classic synths'.... Ober... Prophet, Mellowtron, etc. .... so you really are getting the exact original instrument sounds, as well as the ability to modify those, and/or invent your own new sounds.
With the ES, I can use up to four of these samples at a time... tune or detune them as I want... each with it's own independent parameters, which gives you the warm analog, think-sounding pads (or whatever type of sound you want). Add to that the onboard 16-trk. pattern sequencer, and 16-trk. song sequencer... plus analog inputs/outputs... digital inputs/outputs... all of the midi controls available, like any track can be assigned to any midi channel (great for reassigning sequenced or keyboard work to the dotcom's midi channel #1)(including mod. wheel, pitch-bend, and ribbon controller).... and a whole lot more 'stuff'. And I'm sure the price of the Motif ES has come down now for used, since Yami's introduction of the next line (which is based on the ES's foundation). And, there's three different sizes... I have the 8-octave with weighted keys... but I wouldn't hesitate to get a smaller one. Yami has some incredible samples that you have to hear to believe... something they spent a great deal of time and money on producing.
I just bring this up as an option to be considered... in that, it truely can do all that you're wanting, and so much more... and I've found that it can handle so many of the jobs in the studio (like even running audio thru it just for the effects, then back out)(like an effect send/return).... the ES and my Yami 4416 mixer/recorder are the very heart of my studio. Oh yeah... it has multitrack software for your computer, and connects via USB.
Just a thought. If interested... you might want to check eBay, and see what's up this week... or next. ; )
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: klstay
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:54 AM
Subject: [dotcomformat] Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

Since you plan on putting together a 3 voice .com rig anyway the
questions are:

A) Would 3 note chords satisfy you?

B) Would not having any patch memory be OK for your pad machine?

Even VERY minimally set up you could do pads with a poly MIDI
interface, 3 VCOs, VCF, VCA, EG by just using one of the 3 gates from
the MIDI DAC. Only on CV for keyboard tracking, but with single hand
chording that would generally not be too far off for any of the notes.

Since you are building a 3 voice system anyway then the hurdle for
real 3 note pads becomes filters. I could see having 2 Q107s and a
Q150 in a system, but 3 Q107s is pushing it. Still, if the pads you
could get from that would suffice given the limitations then you also
get all the lack of limitations from being a real modular.

(From what I read of the Mankato I could maybe see having 3 of them
in a system and it being more or less your 'main' filter. Of course
until I get enough pennies saved up to get one for real...)

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "phineousbonemachine"
...> wrote:
>
> --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo wrote:
> >
> > As far as modulars, I wouldn't do it for _pads_. There are a
million
> > old and new synths that will do it a lot less painfully and less
> > expensively.
>
> exactally....thus me question. I want a modern poly analog synth.
Pads
> being its primary job, but not limited to.
>


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1470 - Release Date: 5/28/2008 7:20 AM

Re: Poly analog pads (the big question)

2008-05-28 by phineousbonemachine

WOW Morbius talking digisnths. =)

I like yamaha. Cs1x, Cs6r, an200, dx200(bloth plg cards now live in 
the Cs6r). 

I can sample with the Cs6r also.

If I was going for the all in one GrandPooBa Midi/sampler..ect I was 
looking at the Korg 61 M3, or the ES/XS from yamaha.

I have been drooling over the Motif ES rack for three years now, but 
chose to wait and start building the DotCom. =)

The new PooBa midi digisynth will have to wait untill I get 66spaces 
full of DotCom.

 I have my first 960 and a 22port cab on order (8-12weeks lead time). 

So while I am waiting (and saving cash) I am in the market for a 
modern analog polysynth. 

As it stands right now I use me laptop with Sonar6pro for all midi 
work/recording...with a Novation X-station25 as my stereo D/A/D 
converter. 

I just aquired a lexicon MX400 for all my verbs and delays , plus the 
X-station and nova can also be used in the efx stompbox way.

So what I am getting at is I have all the pieces that a PooBa synth 
would give....just not in a nice single package with keys.

I really think I am going for the prophet08 rack. 

I am also one of those guys that does not keep his studio all hooked 
up....when i want to jam I take me laptop, my Nova, and X-staion in 
the backyard, or over to her house, or just throw em on the couch and 
start jamming. Once the demo is hashed out then I bust out the 
Studiomaster 16-4-2 wire up whats needed and get to work! LOL

my priorites are set..analogpoly, more dotcom, new computer recording 
interface, more dotcom, then the GrandPooBa midi workstaion. 

Thankyou all for the post's

L8r

P

P.S. and of course more DotCom!!

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.