Daniel, did you take any videoclips of the Namm monodemo yourself that you plan to put online? "Sound quality" of the clips i saw sofar and the way the clips were edited didnt do the mono any justice. (although it was cool to see the joystick in action) Well, i ordered mine at my local dealer already anyway. Any idea when you will be able to start delivery of the SFX-60? Will it be possible to use a midicontroller like the chaospad to mimic the function of the joystick? best Hans --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "daniel_elektron" <daniel@e...> wrote: > --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <jmelnyk@c...> wrote: > > --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "droolmaster0" > <implode7@p...> > > wrote: > > > I have heard from someone else also that the synthesis is > limited, > > > and that the sound isn't particularly good. > > > > sound = good is a matter of taste, I guess. but I think that it's > > very good, even in comparison to a Nord and some true analog > > synths I have. > > The general reaction from people we demonstrated the Monomachine to > at the NAMM show was that it sounded fantastic. Also from a > strict "sound quality" aspect. Several people simply said it was the > best sounding current synthesizer, and that it is able to supply a > bottom end not many synthesizers can offer. > > Another reaction was that the joystick was really a big part of the > experience of the Monomachine. > > I don't think we got one single person in there that we didn't > impress with the sounds! Whether that was because of well programmed > presets, a good sound system or maybe actually a good sounding > product is not up to me to judge. > > The demos of the webpage are quite early examples, and we should try > to get new ones now that people get more used to it. I think playing > with the presets for a while would give a better idea of what it is > about. > > ...and about the so called limitations... We have tried to give uable > controls, so that they spur creativity, rather than give all possible > possibilities. For example, that's why the unison width for the five > main oscillators of the SuperWave Saw is controlled by only one > parameter. That makes it more usable in our opinion than having > individual detunes that you never would bother to edit. It's all > about the results, isn't it. That's also why we think it is a major > achievement to have an FM synth controled with seven basic > controlers, all which does relevant actions, rather than all the > parameters in the world, but stick to presets as you never bother to > figure them out. > > Daniel
Message
Re: Monomachine reviews ?questions etc!
2004-01-22 by schmackofanz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.