Emax

i think some of it has to do with what people feel that "secret" weapon *is*
for a certain sound or production that they are looking for.  there's a lot
of hype - if someone finds out that their favorite artist or producer uses a
Casio SK-1 then they *have* to use it too.  i also think maybe another part
of it has to do with how low the value of the dollar is compared to the
Euro, that is, if someone is willing to ship overseas.  Ebay reaches out to
such a broad market that it's really tough to get a deal.  The best bet is
to luck out at someone's garage sale...



On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Alan Currall <alan@...>
wrote:

>   So where does one go for a 'bargain' if everyone who is selling knows
> that they will get their best price on Ebay? Unfortunately, it's a
> market driven economy and these things actually are 'worth' exactly
> what people are willing to pay for them. It's just tough for us poor
> enthusiasts who are priced out of the market.
>
> My only advice (which I find hard to follow myself) is to be patient.
> What goes up, must come down.
>
> That's my 2 cents (probably not enough, I know),
> Alan
>
>
> On 20 Feb 2008, at 10:03PM, Brooks Mosher wrote:
>
> > And there was a Prophet 2002 that just went for over $500 as well
> > on Ebay a
> > week or so ago. Ebay isn't a good place to find a deal and most
> > people are
> > expecting to make a good profit. I see auctions for things like
> > Prophet-5's
> > with a buy it now at $2,000 or Moog Prodigy's for $1,000.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Jonathon Stevens <
> > jonathonbstevens@... <jonathonbstevens%40hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > Althought I really like my emax, I would hesitate to invest much
> > money
> > > for one. You can do a hell of a lot more feature wise with a new
> > machine, so
> > > in my mind the only thing going for the emax is it's somewhat
> > unique sound
> > > and simple interface. I can't imagine it's either cheap or easy
> > to fix a 20+
> > > year old sampler, which to me should be a huge factor with
> > regards to price.
> > >
> > >
> > > For those who have to have "that" sound then there probably is no
> > limit to
> > > the price they'll pay to get it. My cheap SE machine came with a
> > 100+ disc
> > > library, although i didn't get it for the library, i got it for
> > the sound
> > > and interface. Would I pay more than $100? no way. I got a
> > Sequential
> > > prophet 2002 for $25, there's 12 bits and analog filters, not as
> > easy to
> > > use, not as hip as the emax, but it'll get the job done when you
> > want 12 bit
> > > & analog filters.
> > >
> > > But hey, it's just my opinion.
> > >
> > > To: emax@yahoogroups.com <emax%40yahoogroups.com><emax%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > From: plus_321@... <plus_321%40yahoo.com> <plus_321%40yahoo.com>
> > > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:22:08 -0800
> > > Subject: RE: [emax] Re: Price
> > >
> > >
> > > Keep in mind that it was an HD that sold for that much
> > >
> > > and it had an extensive sample library with it.
> > >
> > > An Emax which is SE, but not SE HD is not worth much
> > >
> > > more than a regular Emax, because the only thing that
> > >
> > > separates them is the silk screen on the front of the
> > >
> > > machine since anyone can upgrade an Emax to an Emax SE.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> > >
> > > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> > > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?
> > category=shopping
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]