Yahoo Groups archive

Emax

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:23 UTC

Message

Re: just asking / anyone with a real plus model?

2008-08-15 by Chip

just like mine... 
http://flickr.com/photos/emaxhd/2489389088/

does anyone has a real plus model?

in the emolator archive says that the front panel has dots instead 
bold lines, and i really like to see it!
my emax has the space between the E-mu Systems  and the Emax, but is 
only a HD (non SE) model (later i've done the SE update with the EMX)

chip



--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Epoxy2600" <epoxy2600@...> wrote:
>
> I have an Emax SE HD Plus keyboard:
> 
> Model: 2100
> Serial: 0290151
> 
> I believe it was a factory "Plus" because there is a bigger space 
> between the logos "E-mu Systems" and "Emax" on the back to make 
room 
> for for the SCSI connector compared to other models where the words 
> are closer together (funny that E-mu felt it was worth it to redo 
the 
> silkscreening to accomodate the connector!). But interestingly 
> nowhere on the instrument does it actually say "Plus". In fact from 
> the front it looks identical to a factory SE model (it doesn't even 
> say "HD" so maybe the internal hard drive was added later).
> 
> So maybe the Plus name was more a marketing label and not 
necessarily 
> an official model like SE or HD?
> 
> Unless I'm wrong and someone owns a machine that actually 
says "Plus" 
> on it?
> 
> -Howie
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> >
> > who has the lower emax serial number in this forum?
> > 
> > i have a model 1000 (keyboard, plain purchased), serial number 
2047
> > (i'm not home right now but i think that's the number, at leas the
> > first two digits)
> > and a 1010 model (keyboard, hd inside from factory), serial number
> > 1281020.
> > 
> > The last number doesn't make sense (if only 3000+ emax was 
> produced),
> > but i'm just curious about the history of my emax
> > 
> > cheers
> > 
> > chip
> >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.