> Some confusion here.
>
> Gareth Jones <g@...>
>
>>> > > Latency is going to big a major issue when you move away from PT.
>>> >>
>>> >> RME interfaces have digital i/o, good sounding Analog i/o and LOW
>>> > > latency. I use mine with Apogee Mini-Me
>
> Andreas Gill:
>
>> > Why is latency going to be a bigger issue than on other interfaces, ex.
>> >MOTU or Metric Halo?
>
> I don't think it is, but if so it will have to do with the driver and
> also how low a buffer the hardware is happy working with. MOTU can
> work with a 64K buffer, I believe, and PT's minimum is 128K (which I
> haven't tried yet - the 128K Stream Manager in OS 9 didn't work).
> Plus ESB has a little more latency than some other sound card drivers.
>
> Now, that latency is for audio coming out of the computer, i.e. how
> long it takes between hitting your MIDI keyboard and hearing the
> sound.
>
> The latency Gareth is talking about is when you're recording live
> instruments, which have to go through the computer; Pro Tools *TDM's*
> (not the Pro Tools LE systems') live recording latency is pretty much
> down to the converters themselves, so it's only a couple of
> milliseconds, like on a digital mixer.
>
> ***HOWEVER*** all three cards mentioned above - RME, MOTU, MH - have
> onboard digital mixing, so you can monitor the live input through the
> card and get the same 2.5ms latency. As a matter of fact, I believe
> those are the only three cards with that feature.
>
> I don't know much about the Rosetta 800, but if as I suspect it does
> have standard native audio latency, you could use one of the above
> cards instead of its Firewire option - in other words, you'd just use
> the Rosetta as a converter and connect its digital I/O to the sound
> card.
Ok, I think I get it! Thanks guys!
Andreas
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [EXS] Re: Re: Apogee Rosetta 800
2004-06-30 by Andreas Grill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.