Pete Thomas wrote: > --- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, Bill Canty <Bill@C...> wrote: >>Does anyone know the difference(s) between the Emperor and the >>B\ufffdsendorfer 290? They're both B\ufffdsendorfers and both by Michiel Post, so >>how different can they be? > > I've now got them both, side to side. > > The 290 has a more brittle top with less undamped sustain ringing. The > middle is warmer but less focussed. > > The low end of the 290 is also warmer, not that the Emperor low end is > brighter overall, the Emperor has more low and more high. It still has > a lovely bass sound but seems to have more brightness in with it at > the same time if I'm making myself clear. \ Thanks Pete. No, it's not *that* clear, but if I imagine two different piano sounds I really don't know how I'd describe the differences. So I reckon you've made a terrific attempt! :-) I spose the real point is: are they different enough to warrant having both? Sounds like "yep"...(?)
Message
Re: [EXS] Emperor vs. PMI 290
2004-11-30 by Bill Canty
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.