Thanks for you input as well Nick. --- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, Nick Batzdorf <recording@e...> wrote: > From: "topfloormix" <topfloormix@a...> > > >I did like the VSL pro I hear > >but I haven't heard the Opus 1. Are they similar? > > Same samples, just fewer programs and samples stretched across a > whole step rather then every note. Thanks for that, this is a good news as I did like this library. > >Maybe you think > >that it is not aggressive but the small libray I have is not better, > >far from it. Is GPO any good for my need maybe? > > They're all aggressive if you use the ff programs and use a long predelay. Do you mean the library I already have? I is not as aggressive as the VSL I heard, and I don't want to get back into "reprograming" the samples. The important thing for me is the live response, the same I got with the VSL, my library doesn't have enough good patches for that purpose, I would say they are best suited for writing and programming... I usually play and record the performace live, and then tweak it post recording. LG
Message
Re: Opus 1 vs EWQSL
2004-12-11 by topfloormix
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.