On 03.01.2005, at 23:21, Nick Batzdorf wrote: >> So, If I have the VSL and bring my composition including the library >> to >> a studio, I guess the studio has to refuse if it does not own this >> library. Even if just one tone is used, this can be a violation of the >> copyright because VSL does not sell single tones. Yes, theory is far >> away from daily live, sometimes. > > No. As I said, you have a license to use the library for your own > projects however you want, regardless of your role. You just can't > rent VSL to someone else to use. Sorry if I bring some confusion in here. My experience comes from graphic business (prepress, to be exact). If the artist comes with fonts to the typesetting studio and the studio does not own these fonts they are not allowed to feed that job into the machine. The font manufacturers try to release that somehow but they have no chance anyway. Nobody buys a $100 font to finish a $10 job... VSL *could* say "We don't bother about the composer. But the studio makes full use of our outstanding samples. We have two clients in this workflow". Anyway, this again is speculation. I wrote a mail to VSL to clarify how they handle that issue. >> If the above is true, I would like to know how Emagic handled this. >> Say, I had Logic Platinum, went with my key to the studio (which owned >> only Logic Gold) and produced a CD with plugins of Platinum. > > Why would you not be able to do that? Don't know, it was a question :) Peter Ostry
Message
Re: [EXS] Re: Re: That's a a
2005-01-04 by Peter Ostry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.