--- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, "Sascha Franck" <S.Franck@g...> wrote: > Hans Hafner wrote: > > Maybe they've improved the sampling engine... it's just so bad > > compared to the hardware samplers... > > > > But I think no one seems to mind... > > I actually do. > Aliasing is pretty much of an issue with the EXS, as soon as you don't use at least > one zone per tritone. Add some pitch shifting and you'll need even more. The E-mu hardware samplers used to have something called distortionless pitch shifting which worked great. I'm not sure if their virtual samplers have this. I sure wish the EXS had a similar algorithm. > Kontakt (which I also own) is quite better in that aspect, but on the other hand, the EXS's LP filter IMO is still sounding just great, especially on synth-like basses or squealing resonant stuff. I like the sound of the EXS filters but there is a bug with the LPF. If you listen to a sample that has an LPF with the res set high, you will here a click (like a bad edit) at the very end of the sample. Try this with a deep kick drum and you'll hear what I mean. -Matt
Message
Re: EXS improvements in Logic 7.1
2005-04-07 by mandcmiller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.