--- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, "Sascha Franck" <S.Franck@g...> wrote:
> Hans Hafner wrote:
> > Maybe they've improved the sampling engine... it's just so bad
> > compared to the hardware samplers...
> >
> > But I think no one seems to mind...
>
> I actually do.
> Aliasing is pretty much of an issue with the EXS, as soon as you don't use at least
> one zone per tritone. Add some pitch shifting and you'll need even more.
The E-mu hardware samplers used to have something called distortionless pitch
shifting which worked great. I'm not sure if their virtual samplers have this. I sure
wish the EXS had a similar algorithm.
> Kontakt (which I also own) is quite better in that aspect, but on the other hand,
the EXS's LP filter IMO is still sounding just great, especially on synth-like basses or
squealing resonant stuff.
I like the sound of the EXS filters but there is a bug with the LPF. If you listen to a
sample that has an LPF with the res set high, you will here a click (like a bad edit) at
the very end of the sample. Try this with a deep kick drum and you'll hear what I
mean.
-Matt