"Michael Levine" <mlmusic@...> wrote: > I do think it is different in the US, where Logic seems to be in the > ascent. There is a legitimate question about the wisdom of attaching a > program's fate to a single platform - and by extension, to a single > geographical market - but, for better or for worse, Gerhard et al. have > made their beds in Cupertino. > > I would think that, therefore, Logic would want to make sure that there > were no reason OTHER than the cost of the computer to chose, say, > Cubase over Logic. But there are many ways Cubase is superior - most > obviously in Logic's deeply flawed folder structure - and, despite > repeatedly being informed of these discrepancies, EMapple seems > uninterested in addressing them, instead putting energy toward evolving > into the "pro" version of Garage Band. > > At the time I switched from the then-dead Studio Vision, the question > was "Logic or DP". I never even considered Cubase. If I were at the > same divide now I would be saying "Logic vs. Cubase". I think I'd > still chose Logic, but it wouldn't be a no-brainer. Hi Just wondering... What do you mean by Logic¹s deeply flawed folder structure? * Dave
Message
Re: [EXS] Sascha's comments about what it's like Over There
2005-06-07 by David Gordon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.