--- In exs-users@y..., Dave Peverley <no_such_user@y...> wrote: > --- spudnikpotato@y... wrote: > Thanks for the reply! > I got the impression that after moving files from their original locations, > logic starting up, and operation of the 'flip menu' for instruments became a > *lot* slower on my G3-400. Would you agree with that? Its just a gut feeling > really! I guess the .exs file only stores the orignal location of the file. I > suspect that if emagic could write a utility to update the .exs files entries > as to where the files live after being moved it would speed start up for me > immensely. actually, once its found the files its updated, so subsequent loads of that exs are almost imediate (just the time it takes to load the samples, dosen't have to look for them). I thought that the mac had some sort of master table of files, so finding files was a lot quicker (it can take a long.. time on PC if youve got lots of files and a fragmented HD). I expect tho that it does apply some simple logic (no pun...) to where it searchs, ie, look in the same dir as the exs first, follow the dir structure of the sampler inst's dir etc. I (used to) have samples for the exs's scattered all over my computer, on differant discs, in totatly differant folders logically miles away from where they should be etc, and *thats* when it really takes a while (a couple of minutes) have you tried defragging your hard disc? if youve not done this in a while, it will considerably speed things up, especially if the disc has ever got near full. be carefull tho, if your computer crashes while doing this (which it can, far more than is fair) you may lose all your data and have to format, so back up important data first. > > Ta! > > ~Pev np spud
Message
Re: [exs] EXS organisation of files
2001-10-02 by spudnikpotato@yahoo.co.uk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.