> > Create and tie a splitter to that instrument (connecting the port number to > > the same instrument number) and record all actions on the splitter track in > > the arrange. > > Really? Are you sure this would change the way the audio instrument strip would > respond to incoming cc info? Certainly the assignment of cc numbers to the > various parameters of the instruments and of any plugins on the inserts wouldn't > be changed by this. No, but there can be other advantages using this way of working. - when cabling the channel splitter to different virtual instruments you can control them from within e.g. one Hyper editor for better overview. This is also very handy for controlling various virtual drumsamplers (with different effect settings and routings) from within one matrix editor. Midi channel decides which instrument is adressed. - The recording of automation data can be done from one track in arrange that's linked to the channel splitter and not directly to the instrument. Within an arrangement with a lot of virtuals this can mean the difference reaching the CPU limit or not. When the virtual instrument is the active track realtime CPU is used to make it realtime playable. When the channel splitter is the active track no realtime CPU for live playing is needed for the instrument. Eppo Schaap Galbatron Epic Symphonic Electronica www.galbatron.com music: www.ampcast.com/galbatron
Message
Re: [exs] EXS24 automation
2001-11-30 by Eppo Schaap
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.