sorenrv wrote: > > To me this thread is about using the group to discuss and test our > ethics and for me this is a valuable excercise. Hi Sorens. Yes, I agree, and it is for me too. > > Eli, either you and I disagree on copyright ethics (which from recent > posts I do not think we do) or you have taken one sentence out of > context and chosen to comment on that alone. I wish you would comment > on my post as such. We don't disagree. I'm sorry for taking your sentence out of context. Of course if samples are legitimately copyright clean, it doesn't matter what's on one's hard drive. And it's always our individual responsibilities to have our eyes wide open. This whole issue is very sensitive for me. Over the past few months, many sincere heartfelt posts on this list have caused me to re-think the whole sample piracy issue. Temptation and morality make for a difficult wrestling match. In the past I haven't always been strong. I don't think I'm alone here either.... I'm trying to be a better virtual citizen now. But I don't want to come across like a religious convert preaching the gospel either. Anyway, I don't have any specific point to make.... just that I'm sorry I took your quote out of contect and that I think almost all of us are in agreement around here as to basic distinctions between right and wrong in regards to piracy. Garth makes some compelling distinctions betwen single license useage, and doing work for clients with one's single license software. I have worked in several post production houses and I think Garth is correct in that it's not the big commercial money making studios that are the problem. It's the casual attitudes of individual users that cause the hemmoraging (sp?) of intellectual property. -- Eli Krantzberg Nightshift Orchestra / Almat Productions http://www.nightshiftorchestra.com
Message
Re: [exs] New patch: Congaloop
2002-02-11 by Eli Krantzberg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.