Compelling argument, although sample vendors will no doubt disagree. You do a good job of articulating a strong argument however. Thanks for your perspective. > From: Teddy Kumpel <teddybut@...> > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:44:29 -0500 > To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [exs] Re: New patch: Congaloop > >> sorenrv wrote: >> >>> Your >>> concern should be in case you release music to the general public >>> where you use sounds and/or loops that could be copyright protected. >> >> What's that expression "possession is nine tenths of the law"? I think just >> having (and using) unpaid for commercial samples is against the spirit of >> the law (if not the moral paradigm) regardless of whether you release music >> commercially an/or make money with it or not. >> >> A home hobbiest using an unpaid for commercial sample for pleasure is no >> less illegal than Michael Jackson using that same sample on a million seller >> hit. Morally, we can come up with all kinds of justifications, but legally, >> this part at least, seems fairly clear. > > actually, as far as I know sorenv is right. I am published by EMI and I have > to clear all the samples I use on song demos with them. If I use a sample in > a song that I lifted I have to list that sample on my song form so EMI can > clear it IF IT BECOMES SOMETHING THAT IS GOING TO GET RELEASED. Do you think > they clear every sample I used? hell no, that would take too much manpower. > They only have to clear them when something's getting released. I also doubt > this applies to single shot samples, only phrases longer than 3 or 4 notes. > > Here's a scenario Hypothetically: Say I want to write a song like... > "whatever" by Brittany Spears (god forbid). Someone hires me to do that. > They want the groove and vibe to be the same. I might (hypo) sample > Brittany's song, produce to it, and later take her sample out of the > production. Is that illegal? no way!!! As long as my music doesn't resemble > hers it's fine. If there were melodies copied directly it is against the > law. But using the sample to work with to get the same vibe is not illegal > because it's not being released on the final version. > > I played on the Vanilla Ice album, "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2". I am > not proud of this. BUT... the session was a recreation of the Sly song > "Thank you fer lettin me be mice elf". we had to copy what was on the > recording as exactly as possible. Obviously the label was too cheap to pay > Sly for the sound recording, so they hired us to record their own. I think > in this case Sly still gets songwriting credit but whoever owns the masters > can't get a sample license fee. Anyway... about %50 of the gtr sessions I > did in the early 90's went like that.... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz > > So to sum up. > > if you aren't releasing it on a CD, don't worry. > > If you are, clear the stuff first to avoid lawsuits. > > enjoy. > > Teddy K > > -- > GO SEE > http://www.teddybut.com and http://www.mp3.com/teddybut > Kumpelstiltskin Music, Inc./EMI Music Publishing > Burning Beagle Studios, Brooklyn, NY > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [exs] Re: New patch: Congaloop
2002-02-12 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.