> What's this all about? I've never viewed mp3s with such scrutiny. I've > always thought of them as far better than tape, but not nearly as good as a > CD. I take them with a grain of salt. They sound great on the iPod in > headphones, but I don't use that for my main stereo speakers in the living > room, so... Just curious what your application is and what merits such > hair-splitting analysis. Thanks in advance for humoring me. -Jer > > I've always been comfortable with SoundJam's results. I generally do 192 to > conserve space, since I try to balance quality vs. space on the portable > device (actually, it was my Christmas gift to my wife and no I don't use the > gift I gave her. I simply burned many of the mp3s that were initially placed > on the iPod). There are several radiostations preferring mp3 to wave.(I do not agree with they're choice.) My search is for the best encoder there is .No matter the price. I get well paid for delivery, and sound, not format. If a radio prefers mp3, I try to deliver it at least at the competitors standards. I'm pleased if I can humor you.... My job is to deliver.....whatever format..... [@nders] -- www.revolvermusic.no Mac G4 450MP - OS 9.2.2 - 384ram - Logic 4.8.1 TC Powercore 1.5 - Motu 2408 - RamsaDA7 ES-1 - EXS24 - NI B4 - Recycle 2.0 PSP MIX&Stereo Pack - Silverspike Reverbit- (and about every free VST I could find)
Message
Re: Re mp3/itunes
2002-02-22 by Anders Elverhøy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.