Funny. Actually, your response is very, very interesting to me. Thanks for being so thorough. > From: Anders Elverhøy <anders@...> > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 04:25:18 +0100 > To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [exs] Re: Re mp3/itunes > > >> What's this all about? I've never viewed mp3s with such scrutiny. I've >> always thought of them as far better than tape, but not nearly as good as a >> CD. I take them with a grain of salt. They sound great on the iPod in >> headphones, but I don't use that for my main stereo speakers in the living >> room, so... Just curious what your application is and what merits such >> hair-splitting analysis. Thanks in advance for humoring me. -Jer >> >> I've always been comfortable with SoundJam's results. I generally do 192 to >> conserve space, since I try to balance quality vs. space on the portable >> device (actually, it was my Christmas gift to my wife and no I don't use the >> gift I gave her. I simply burned many of the mp3s that were initially placed >> on the iPod). > > There are several radiostations preferring mp3 to wave.(I do not agree with > they're choice.) > My search is for the best encoder there is .No matter the price. > I get well paid for delivery, and sound, not format. > If a radio prefers mp3, I try to deliver it at least at the competitors > standards. > I'm pleased if I can humor you.... > My job is to deliver.....whatever format..... > > > [@nders] > -- > www.revolvermusic.no > > Mac G4 450MP - OS 9.2.2 - 384ram - Logic 4.8.1 > TC Powercore 1.5 - Motu 2408 - RamsaDA7 > > ES-1 - EXS24 - NI B4 - Recycle 2.0 > PSP MIX&Stereo Pack - Silverspike Reverbit- > (and about every free VST I could find) > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [exs] Re: Re mp3/itunes
2002-02-22 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.