Hi Juanje, --- In exs-users@y..., "juanjeluzardo" <jluzardo@t...> wrote: > I get the exs24 last week, it really rocks. I'm curious about the > akai traslation quality. Are all parameters translated (mapping, > loop, tuning, velocity, ADSR, filter, controllers, lfo...)? or is better > to wait for Cdxtract or traslator release? (by the way, are available > yet?) IMHO, the bundled Akai conversion utility that comes with the exs-24 is okay if you only have 2 or 3 CD-Roms to convert. Otherwise, I would recommend either Translator or CDXtract. The conversion utility in exs-24 is extremely slow compared to these other conversion programs. Also, I found that there are many samples that come across with clicks in them (where they don't have them on an Akai sampler) or the loops are wrong. Incidentally, I also found this with some of the CDXtract conversions when I was comparing it to Translator. I believe that currently Translator is the best conversion utility available at the moment. CDXtract isn't bad, don't get me wrong. However, I feel that Translator is more accurate at its conversions. If you were asking about a Mac version, it is not available for either program yet but both companies say that one will be available very soon. It is my understanding that both will work under Virtual PC though I haven't tried it myself since I am already on a PC. HTH, Fernstudio
Message
Re: akai->exs traslation quality
2002-04-08 by nando10000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.