In a message dated 7/9/02 1:16:26 AM, saschafranck@... writes: > >I'd say so too. But do you really think it will even halfway deliver like >the double performance? This is what next years single CPU PCs should bring, >compared to, say, a dual 1GHz Mac. > Well...there is so little "real" performace increase from a single processor Mac with current Logic, and a dual processor. I heard it is something like MIDI and the Graphics are loaded to one processor? That's not the important stuff of course. We need native FX and instruments to be split between the processors to see the real increase. The only part of current Logic that is Altivec coded is the Mixer...what about all the effects and instruments. So yes, I think that the performance increase with tighter coding to Apple's OSX and taking advance of all of this stuff that's already in the Apple hardware. Best case is that Emagic gets it more together like Reason is. It is amazing how processor efficient that program is! I never run out of CPU power, and you can have scads of instruments, effects, tracks playing...amazing. Since it obvious that lt CAN be done like the props have shown us, maybe emagic will have the opportunity to do this now with a big influx of cash, developers and focusing specifically on OSX only now. It will be interesting to see for sure! -EP
Message
Re: [exs] Logic on a mac
2002-07-09 by PersingEP@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.